![]() |
Ritu Kamra Kumar |
The Bank That Never Opened
The painting hangs in the gallery: a woman in a faded blue coat, standing before the locked shutters of a grand but desolate bank. Her name is Lydia. The onlookers who pause before the canvas often whisper, “She waits for what was hers.” But Lydia’s story is more than a brushstroke—it is the story of countless women who trusted institutions, only to be betrayed by them.
Lydia was a nurse, gentle and generous, the kind of soul who wrapped both wounds and words with warmth. Her life had been stitched with sorrow—her parents separated early, her mother died young, her father remarried and drifted away. Out of that solitude, Lydia carved resilience. She adopted two orphans, Daniel and Clara, determined they would never taste the bitterness of abandonment. She poured into them her modest earnings, her mothering tenderness, and her unshakable faith in education.
For decades she deposited her savings into Horizon Trust Bank, a neighbourhood institution that advertised integrity, transparency, and “banking with benevolence.” The posters bore smiling faces; the chairman gave lofty speeches about empowering the common people. Lydia, like many, believed.
But one Monday morning, she arrived to update her passbook and found the shutters sealed. A handwritten notice fluttered: “Bank under investigation. Operations suspended.” Overnight, dreams dissolved. Depositors discovered that the bank had been siphoning funds into real-estate rackets and phantom firms. The chairperson, a smooth-tongued man named Richard Caldwell, was accused of colluding with politicians, funnelling fortunes into offshore accounts. The case became a headline: “Horizon Trust Scam Swindles Thousands.”
Lydia felt crushed, yet not broken. Every day she returned, standing opposite the closed bank, as if her presence could shame the shutters open. “This is not only money, this is my children’s dignity, my decades of duty.”
Others joined her. There was Mr. Brown, a retired schoolteacher who had invested his pension. His hands shook as he clutched faded receipts. There was Mrs. Harper, a florist whose daughter’s wedding was postponed because the savings vanished. There was George, a taxi driver who had set aside coins for his son’s college admission. Together they formed a circle of loss, but also of resistance.
They would gather on the pavement, facing the bolted doors. Someone would bring tea, another biscuits, and conversations became chronicles of betrayal. Lydia emerged as their quiet leader who spoke with a solemn clarity that carried weight.
“You know,” she said once, “Simone de Beauvoir wrote, ‘Waiting is a trap. There will always be reasons to wait. The truth is, there are only two things in life, reasons and results, and reasons simply don’t count.’ Our waiting here must not be silent. Our waiting is witness.” The group nodded, She became their polestar, standing steady, silently indicting the system.
Journalists arrived, scribbling notes. One young reporter, Rachel Thomas, framed Lydia’s vigil as symbolic. “A society is judged not by its skyscrapers but by its safeguards,” she wrote. “When banks betray the very hands that built them—nurses, teachers, drivers—the economy is not merely shaken, it is shamed.” Her article went viral.
Still, the legal machinery moved slowly. Committees were constituted, commissions convened, case files circulated in labyrinthine loops. The culprits found bail, citing ‘health reasons’ and ‘political pressure.’ Ordinary depositors were handed technical jargon: liquidation, recovery, restructuring. Lydia listened, bewildered. “I only know injections and bandages,” she said, “not liquidation.”
Yet she refused despair. “My children must not see me crumble,” she reminded herself. Daniel, now studying engineering, urged her to move on. Clara, pursuing law, insisted she file a case. “Mum,” Clara said, “justice delayed is not justice denied. Let us fight.”
And fight they did. The group appointed Clara as their legal voice. She researched precedents of bank fraud, cited the Lehman Brothers collapse, referenced the 2008 financial crisis victims. Her petitions reached consumer courts, banking ombudsman, even the High Court.
The hearings became miniature theatre. Lawyers of the accused flaunted loopholes. Judges postponed. But Lydia and her circle kept arriving, their presence an unspoken testimony. They reminded the nation that behind each number in the scam report was a life, a livelihood, a lost future.
One winter evening, as the group sat opposite the shuttered bank, a little boy approached. He offered Lydia a daisy. “My mother says you are like Joan of Arc, standing against the fire.” Lydia smiled, her eyes moist. Perhaps endurance was its own form of divinity.
Months stretched into years. Finally, a ray of redemption arrived: the government announced partial reimbursement from the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation. Each depositor would receive up to five thousand pounds. It was not the full sum, but it was a recognition of their right. Lydia clasped the cheque, not for herself, but for her children.
The fellowship rejoiced. Mr. Brown bought books for underprivileged students. Mrs. Harper managed her daughter’s wedding in modest grace. George paid his son’s fees. Lydia used the money to secure Clara’s enrolment in a law master’s program—so that she might continue to fight for those voiceless victims of financial fraud.
The painting in the gallery captures only one moment—Lydia before the bank that never opened. But the story beyond the frame is one of stubborn hope. For Lydia’s vigil was not vain; it became voice. It showed that even in a system scarred by scams and scams men, the steadfast stance of a simple nurse could inspire solidarity and scrutiny.
No comments :
Post a Comment
We welcome your comments related to the article and the topic being discussed. We expect the comments to be courteous, and respectful of the author and other commenters. Setu reserves the right to moderate, remove or reject comments that contain foul language, insult, hatred, personal information or indicate bad intention. The views expressed in comments reflect those of the commenter, not the official views of the Setu editorial board. рдк्рд░рдХाрд╢िрдд рд░рдЪрдиा рд╕े рд╕рдо्рдмंрдзिрдд рд╢ाрд▓ीрди рд╕рдо्рд╡ाрдж рдХा рд╕्рд╡ाрдЧрдд рд╣ै।