- Tanmay Sunil Bhamre
Tanmay Sunil Bhamre is currently studying English Literature and Economics at B.K. Birla College, Kalyan, (MMR) . He is an avid reader and skater and aspires to join the army.
Abstract:
In recent days after passing of the Citizenship
Amendment Act, 2019, the word “Orwellian” has reentered popular discourse and
could be found in various newspaper headlines. Similarly, after election of
President Donald Trump as the 45th President of United States of
America, George Orwell’s classic book
‘Nineteen Eighty-Four,’ saw a massive surge in sales. His
works have been interpreted by different generation of readers differently
according to their contemporary events. Since the novel’s publication, critics
have acknowledged that ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ refers to something
but they continued to debate as what does it refer to – Stalin’s USSR? Post-War
Britain? Mao’s China?
This paper is an attempt to
retrace Orwell’s political developments and relevance of his works in recent
times. This paper also attempts to probe into various manifestations of Orwellian
‘Doublespeak’ in an age of information and technology and analyses how
language, politics and truth are intertwined.
Keywords:
Orwellian, Totalitarian, Language, Politics, Relevance.
George Orwell’s Enduring Relevance
Recently you must have heard the term ‘Orwellian’ tossed
around in newspapers or in one political context or another. But have you ever
wondered what exactly does it mean or where do its origins lie or why is it
used so frequently?
The term ‘Orwellian’ was coined after British author
Eric Blair who is known by his pen name George Orwell.
His most famous work Nineteen Eighty-Four
depicts a dystopian future in which mankind is under rule of a tyrannical,
authoritative regime. Hence, the term ‘Orwellian’ is simply used to describe
something authoritative or dictatorial. But using it this way, the term fails
to fully convey Orwell’s message. He actually wanted to point out and warn us that
how easy it is (even for democracies) to give rise to authoritative regimes in
this age of technological advancement and militaristic expansion. Therefore,
the term ‘Orwellian’ actually describes a government which infuses totalitarian
policies with propaganda, surveillance, denial of truth, misinformation and
manipulation of past.
George Orwell was born on June 25, 1903 in Bihar,
India, then part of the British Empire. After serving as imperial policeman in
Burma, he settled for a job of a literary critic, working in a book shop and
ended up writing a few books of his own. He wrote literature for the only
reason it ultimately exists which is to try to change the world for the better.
In a deeper sense, he was a political writer someone who wanted art to help us
grow kinder, fairer, and wiser.
George Orwell always hated the social group, of which he was, in spite of
everything, an exemplary member: The Intellectuals. He accused them of a number of sins
-lack of patriotism, resentment of money and of facade
and immorality. In his essay “England Your England”, written during the
Blitz of 1941, Orwell writes:
“In intention, at any
rate, the English intelligentsias are Europeanized. They take their cookery
from Paris and their opinions from Moscow. In the general patriotism of the
country they form a sort of island of dissident thought. England is perhaps the
only great country whose intellectuals are ashamed of their own nationality. In
left-wing circles it is always felt that there is something slightly
disgraceful in being an Englishman and that it is a duty to snigger at every
English institution, from horse racing to suet puddings. It is a strange fact,
but it is unquestionably true that almost any English intellectual would feel
more ashamed of standing to attention during ‘God save
the King’ than of stealing from a poor box.” (England Your England by G. Orwell)
Orwell's generation of intellectuals, in fact, have lived through some
of the most gruesome events of history – the First World War and the following Great
Depression, thus many of them were obsessed with airy, abstract and grand
schemes to redeem humanity from itself. Some were fanatical communists, others were
staunch defenders of radical capitalism, and few admired the new authoritarian
regimes of Italy, Spain, and Germany, and wanted something similar to take hold
in the English-speaking sphere. He listened, and was for a time, a little
seduced. His greatness lies in the rye determination with which he recognized and triumphed against such
tendencies in him.
George Orwell, today, is extremely famous for two books – Nineteen Eighty-Four and Animal Farm. Reading them is a gut-wrenching
experience – not only because he made an accurate prediction of the techno-political
future but also because he teaches us how literature should be written in an
age of movies and mass communication. In short, he understood that the task of
a writer was to ensure that even the most serious message should reach ordinary
public.
Animal Farm is a story about how revolutions fall prey
to counter-revolutions and turn back on their own original ideas. It is a
satirical comment on the progress of the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution.
He wanted to make sure that his message reaches even to the mass audience and
ordinary people, so he did what – Aesop, La Fontaine and Walt Disney did which
is to tell a story about humans using animals.
The story begins on Manor Farm in England, where all farm
animals come together and decide to overthrow the ruthless and neglectful farmer,
Mr. Jones, and run the farm for themselves. After a successful takeover of the
farm, the animals collectively charter a set of seven commandants for every
animal to abide by with a dream of creating a society where every animal is
free, equal and can achieve his or her full potential.
“The Seven
Commandants of Animalism –
- Whatever
goes upon two legs is an enemy.
- Whatever
goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
- No
animal shall wear clothes.
- No
animal shall sleep in a bed.
- No
animal shall drink alcohol.
- No
animal shall kill any other animal.
- All
animals are equal.” (Animal Farm by G. Orwell)
Time
flies and pigs with help of their notorious leader, Napoleon, fill the power
vacuum and increase their authority over other animals, awarding themselves
with increasing special privileges. They quell other animals’ questions and
protests by threatening them. Slowly every one of the seven commandants is
rewritten by the pigs to suit their purpose and the charter now reads –
· Four
legs good, two legs better.
· Animal
on four legs or with wings is inferior, so two legs better.
· No
animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.
· No
animal shall drink alcohol to excess.
· No
animal shall kill any other animal without cause.
· All
animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. (Animal Farm by G. Orwell)
By the end of the story,
other animals could no longer differentiate between their old master (Human)
and new masters (Pigs).
With sarcastic humour, Orwell makes the story more luscious without
failing to convey his message. Thus, whenever a revolution goes wrong – whether
it’s Arab Spring or Umbrella Revolution– people still bring up Animal Farm. The scenes from Animal
Farm are also familiar to those who are living in today’s India where there
are those who promise a society where everybody is equal, and yet they believe
that they deserve more privileges than others; where politicians openly brand a
whole group of people as Invaders just to appease and increase their vote bank.
His masterpiece novel
Nineteen Eighty-Four is an attempt to
warn the society of its own alarming trends. The government of Nineteen Eighty-Four’s Oceania controls
its citizens thoughts and actions. Their every move is monitored by the
government using “Telescreens.”
The citizens live under a constant threat looming overhead as to what happens
to those who step out of line. In order to blind the citizenry to their enslavement
and crush any sign of defiance, the government operates a Ministry of Truth that prints porn novels
alongside movies that ooze with sex and rubbishes newspapers that contain almost
nothing but sport, crime and astrology. The ministry also pumps out alternate
narratives such as-
“War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength” (Nineteen
Eighty-Four by G. Orwell)
This deliberate irony is an example of doublespeak, when
words are used not to convey meaning but to undermine it, corrupting the very
ideas they refer to. Doublespeak, today, has become a central part in
vocabulary of Indian Politicians and even a few media houses that use pretentious words to project authority, or make atrocities
and encounters seem acceptable by burying them in euphemisms and complicated sentence structures.
He understood how important language is in building a nation and thus in his essay ‘Politics and English Language’, he
writes-
“Political language – and
with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to
Anarchists – is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable,
and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” (Politics and English Language by G. Orwell)
His essay warns us that if thought can corrupt language, language too can corrupt
thought. He believed that totalitarianism and corruption of language are
connected. Language gives individual the power to construct and formulate
ideas. But when language itself is restrained, it can affect how an individual
thinks and can also be used to control what he thinks. In order to suppress
rebellious thoughts, the government of Nineteen
Eighty-Four’s Oceania replaces English with Newspeak – a dialect which
alters the whole structure of language making it impossible for the citizens
even to conceive rebellious and disobedient actions, because there are no words
in Newspeak to make them think of the same.
Orwell particularly criticized his contemporary
writers who he claimed slipped into bad writing and used meaningless or hackneyed
phrases and called it a "packet of aspirins always at one's elbow".
He recommended “Remedy of Six Rules” in his essay “Politics and English Language” to counter many of these faults.
They are as follows:
1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which
you are used to seeing in print. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
2.
If it is possible to
cut a word out, always cut it out.
3.
Never use the passive where you can use the active.
4.
Never use a foreign
phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
5.
Break any of these
rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.” (Politics and
English Language by G. Orwell)
Satire plays a key role in highlighting Orwell’s messages.
“The
Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies,
the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.
These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary
hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink” (Nineteen Eighty-Four by G. Orwell)
Like the Ministries from Nineteen Eighty-Four, man today is dominated by big corporate and social
media companies –who deploy vast armies of
humans and algorithms that surveil their users 24/7 – bombarding them with target-based
ads to keep them spending more and more. Similarly,
today we observe a wholesale dwarfing of
the individual by gigantic expansion of the powers of the state. Even as I write
there are more than a million people in Hong-Kong fiercely protesting, since
last six months for Universal suffrage and basic human rights against a country
which recently persecuted Uighur Muslims.
“Winston could not definitely remember a time when his country has
not been at war,” Orwell wrote in Nineteen Eighty-Four. This is
particularly relevant in case of America who has constantly been at war in one form
or other. Just like in the novel, the war takes place off-stage (overseas) and
its progress could occasionally be heard over news.
“It is
a warfare of limited aims between combatants who are unable to destroy one
another, [and] have no material cause for fighting.… [It] involves very small
numbers of people, mostly highly trained specialists, and causes comparatively
few casualties. The fighting, when there is any, takes place on the vague
frontiers whose whereabouts the average man can only guess at.… In the centres
of civilization war means no more than … the occasional crash of a rocket bomb
which may cause a few scores of deaths.” (Nineteen Eighty-Four by G. Orwell)
This passage from the novel is eerily prescient as it foreshadows
an era in which superpowers (like United States of America) use sophisticated
weaponry and drones to conduct missile strikes and place few Special Operations
teams across remote locations to conduct missions. Another most shocking relevance
I found out while reading the novel is how Nineteen
Eighty-Four foreshadows the use of torture against an endless “War on
Terror”.
Orwell once wrote, “Those who control the present, control
the past and those who control the past, control the future.” That is why,
today, we observe a massive push to rewrite history and to glorify past
struggles of which we were never part of.
Many things have changed
since Orwell wrote his terrifying books – few even say that things
have not turned out that bad. But
Orwell never intended his works to be a prediction, only a warning. So, whether you live in Hong-Kong or
Delhi or New York, one cannot deny that Orwell had remarkable wisdom to
make his works future-proof and that is why his books seem relevant for different reasons in
different times.
Orwell, as you can see, has had a very active life even after
death.
Works Cited-
- Orwell, George
(1941). England Your England - The Lion
and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius. London: Secker &
Warburg.
- Orwell, George
(2006). Politics and the English Language. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
- Orwell, George
(1946). Animal Farm. New York: The New American Library. ISBN
978-1-4193-6524-9.
- Orwell, George (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. A novel. London: Secker & Warburg
Just brilliant! The country needs young authors like you to spread the truth and eliminate the false facade of lies..
ReplyDelete