- Shweta Tiwari
Abstract
Ecofeminism claims that
the oppression of women parallels the exploitation of nature and that the
liberation of both is intertwined. The proponents of the movement derive their
hypothesis from the value hierarchy and oppositional dualism rampant in the society.
Ecofeminists intend to make people more perceptive to the subjugation of women
and the consequent degradation of the environment but in doing so they
reiterate numerous gender stereotypes. They believe that women by
virtue of their gender are kinder than men and hence
can relate more effectively to the ‘mother’ earth. This not only promotes the
obsolete theory of biological determinism but also relegates women to the
conventional role of care-giving. Also, the over-privileging of women’s bodily
functions such as menstruation, pregnancy and child-birth and its connection
with the fertility of nature is like endorsing motherhood as the most important
role in a woman’s life. Through Anita Desai’s Fire on the Mountain, the paper seeks to foreground theoretical
loopholes in ecofeminism and that the relationship between women and nature is
not absolute but ambivalent. The women characters in the novel straddle grey
zones between the nature and culture binary based on which the paper argues for
letting such ambivalence freely emerge in contemporary ecofeminist discourses.
Keywords: the
Ambivalent, Culture, Dualism, Ecofeminism, Nature
Bio-note: Dr. Shweta Tiwari is currently working as an Assistant Professor in Amity School of English and Research Studies, Amity University. Her research papers and short stories have been published in journals like Indraprastha and Muse India.
Email Address: itsmeshweta.431@rediffmail.com
Reconfiguring Ecofeminism: A Study of Women Characters In Fire On The Mountain
Tracing the Trajectory
I know I am made from
this earth, as my mother’s hands were made from this earth, as her dreams came
from this earth and all that I know, I know on this earth, the body of the bird, this pen, this paper, these
hands, this tongue speaking, all I know speaks to me through this earth and I
long to tell you, you who are earth too, and listen as we speak to each other
of what we know: the light is in us. (Griffin, 227)
Coined by the French
feminist Francoise d’ Eaubonne, eco-feminisme
began as an aesthetic-activist movement committed to examine the ramifications
of sprawling urbanization on the ecosystem and women. An array of thinkers like
Mary Daly, Carolyn Merchant and Karen J. Waren argued against Western
anthropocentric/patriarchal environmental paradigms that reduce nature and
living organisms into lucrative objects. They also identified women as agents
of change on account of their being allegedly more empathetic than their male
counterparts. Perceiving women and nature as mutually reinforcing entities may or
may not be liberating but it is problematic. The paper seeks to examine the
lacunae in ecofeminist theory. On the basis of theoretical gaps it offers that the
bond between women and nature is not absolute but ambivalent. It further
situates ecofeminism in the Indian context and explores its reception by Indian
English women writers with special emphasis on Anita Desai’s Fire on the Mountain.
Interconnectedness
between women and nature is embedded in historical, ideational and
epistemological realms. From times immemorial, the reproductive capacity of a
woman has been restricted within the confines of heteronormativity and
motherhood across histories. Imposed gendered regulations led them to assume
the role of a wife, breeder, feeder and ensurer of domestic tranquility. They
continued to foster their male-dominated, ancestor-oriented families despite
having limited resources. Over time, women began to be seen as a source of
care-giving and sustainable development just like nature. Ideational or
conceptual association between gender and ecology is grounded in the reductive
model of binary opposition. Value dualism like reason-emotion, flesh-spirit,
day-night, heaven-hell create hierarchy and make any pair oppositional rather
than complimentary. In a patriarchal society, traits like strength, valour and
aggression are related to men while women epitomize docility, benevolence and
modesty. Thus, the reason behind equating culture with men and nature with
women is not far to seek. Even the destructive forces of nature like storm,
flood and volcanic eruptions are considered essential for keeping the ecology
balanced just like a stern mother trying to discipline her child. Epistemic
norms greatly influence what one regards as knowledge. Feminist epistemology
states that knowledge was always created and disseminated from a masculine
perspective therefore “various kinds of practical know-how and personal
knowledge (knowledge that bears the marks of knower’s biography and identity),
such as the kind of untheoretical knowledge as mothers have of children, are
undervalued when they are labeled “feminine” (Anderson, 50). Similarly, the
belief that women are the most adversely affected by environmental degradation
and they are closer to nature than men places them in an epistemologically
privileged position. This implies that they have the authority to furnish as
well as alter knowledge related to nature. In this case ecofeminism as
Sandilands avows, “locates itself as a theory and movement which bridges the
gap between feminism and ecology, but which transforms both to create a unified
praxis to end all forms of domination” (3). Whether ecofeminism bridges the gap
between feminism and environmental concerns or increases it, needs a closer
analysis.s
Feminists dismiss the
theory of biological determinism and contend that behavioral traits of both men
and women are socio-culturally acquired. They exercise meticulous care while
bringing within the scholarly ambit, women’s bodily functions like menstruation
and pregnancy lest they promote essentialism. Lee and Coen make a pertinent
remark in this regard, “A prevailing fear among feminist scholars has been
that, by studying uniquely female processes such as menstruation one might
indirectly perpetuate the essentialist ideology which defines women as sex
objects and reproducers, which sees women as being at the mercy of their
biology” (6). On the contrary, ecofeminism is premised on the understanding
that women-specific physiological functions such as ovulation, menstruation,
pregnancy, labor pain and breast-feeding facilitate women to connect with
‘mother’ earth. Thus, drawing a comparison between life-giving ability of women
and nature reinforces gendered stereotypes. Furthermore, ecofeminism fails to
accommodate women whose sex, gender and sexual orientation does not align with
socially-acceptable standards. This means that if menstruation and child-birth
connect women to nature then trans-women and lesbians fall outside the domain
of ecofeminism. The second predominant postulation of ecofeminism is that women
and nature are united by a common oppressor. It cannot be denied that men have
exploited women and nature for centuries but to believe that subjugation makes
women more sensitive towards nature would be a sweeping generalization. Infact,
it is like stating that being oppressed is a prerequisite to be perceptive to environmental degradation.
Over-likening women to nature makes ecofeminism full of some glaring
distortions. These include over-simplification of a global crisis, ignoring the
participation of women in the destruction of natural habitats in the past as
well as the present and undermining the contribution of men to conserve
ecosystems. By privileging women over men, ecofeminists unwittingly create a
model that bears a striking resemblance to patriarchy. Plumwood observes:
Perhaps the most obvious
way to interpret ecofeminist argument is as one which replaces the masculine
model of human character by a new feminine model. That is if the masculinizing
strategy rejected the feminine character ideal and affirmed a masculine one for
both sexes, this feminizing strategy rejects the masculine character ideal and
affirms a feminine one for both sexes. (20)
Most of the works on the
colonial era did not acknowledge women as historical or cultural subjects. The
introduction of a postcolonial-feminist view point marked a radical departure
from the past writings that were blind to the gender-class-caste nexus. However,
ecofeminism and ecocriticism despite being relatively new concepts have betrayed
traces of the Eurocentric worldview. Ecofeminist movement focused on socially
advantaged females while largely excluding the concerns of ‘poor’ women hailing
from ‘lower-castes’ in ‘Third-World’ countries. Indian women writers such as
Mahasweta Devi, Kiran Desai, Arundhati Roy and social activists like Medha
Patkar, C.K. Janu have raised the awareness of people about Postcolonial
ecofeminism. However, even postcolonial ecofeminists remain unsuccessful in
offering a viable blueprint for the conservation of the
environment. For example, Vandana Shiva in her magnum
opus launches a scathing attack on the western ideal of scientific reductionism
but at the same time her over-romanticization of Third World women dilutes the
potency of her argument. There are two main problems with the solution that
Shiva proposes. Firstly, she glorifies subalterns (women, tribals, peasants) to an extent that it seems almost illogical. Secondly, she completely ignores the rural-urban and rich-poor divide among women of the Third World. The following excerpt highlights the lack of pragmatism in her proposition:
Shiva proposes. Firstly, she glorifies subalterns (women, tribals, peasants) to an extent that it seems almost illogical. Secondly, she completely ignores the rural-urban and rich-poor divide among women of the Third World. The following excerpt highlights the lack of pragmatism in her proposition:
In contemporary times,
Third World women, whose minds have not yet been dispossessed or colonised, are
in a privileged position to make
visible the invisible oppositional categories that they are custodians of. It
is not only as victims but also as leaders in creating new intellectual
ecological paradigms, that women are central to arresting and overcoming
ecological crisis . . . Third World women, and those tribals and peasants who
have been left out of the processes of maldevelopment, are today acting as the
intellectual gene pools of ecological categories of thought and action.
Marginalisation has thus become a source of healing the diseased mainstream of
patriarchal development. (44-45)
Women and Environmental Movements in India
Ecological activism also
known as green politics dates back to the seventeenth century in India. This
indicates that Indians were conscious of the overuse of renewable resources and
deterioration of nature much before ecocriticism emerged as an academic
discipline. Some of the country’s local environmental movements include the
‘Bishnoi Movement’ (1730) in which hundreds of Bishnoi villagers hugged the
trees and protested against their felling by the king’s soldiers. The ‘Chipko
Movement’ (1973) sprung from the awareness of the villagers that trees are
important for soil conservation and reducing pollution. They too hugged the
trees and fought for harvest rights. The movement created a global impact. The
‘Save Silent Valley’ (1978) was directed against the establishment of a
hydroelectric project across the Kunthipuzha river that flows in the valley.
Tribals of Bihar opposed the government’s decision of planting profitable teak
trees in place of natural Sal trees. This led to the ‘Jungle Bachao Andholan’
(1982). The ‘Appiko Movement’ (1983) witnessed people from all corners of
Karnataka district who not only embraced trees to protect them but also carried
out foot marches to promote afforestation. An objection by the locals to the
construction of several dams on the Narmada river culminated in the ‘Narmada
Bachao Andholan’ (1985). Another group of activists initiated the ‘Tehri Dam
Movement’ (1990) to stop the construction of dams on Tehri river owing to a
number of reasons like rapidly-submerging forest and seismic susceptibility of
the region. Women were indispensable to these mobilizations but the reason
behind their avid participation was more practical than sentimental. Much like
men, women objected to anthropogenic activities, commercialization of forests
and ruination of flora-fauna because nature served as a source of sustenance
and livelihood for them.
Ecofeminism and India Women Writers
Women Writings in Indian
English is a burgeoning literary area that integrates creativity with critical
inquiry. Indian Women Writers have periodically responded to social issues that
are inextricably linked with environmental concerns. Writer-activist, Mahasweta
Devi’s name in the field of ecofeminist writing needs no introduction. The
sufferings of tribals and outcastes find an extensive documentation in Devi’s
novels such as Hajar Churashir Ma
(Mother of 1084) and short stories like “Draupadi” and “Rudaali”. Arundhati Roy
is yet another noted writer who won the Booker Prize for her debut novel, The God of Small Things. She furnishes
a severe criticism of Cartesian philosophy of dualism, state-sponsored
development projects and nuclear testing in her writings. Likewise, a prolific
poet and critic, Nandini Sahu deliberates on the relationship between woman and
her surroundings in most of her poems. Her oft-quoted poetic narrative, Sita: (A Poem) is an ecofeminist
rendering of the Ramayana. Contrary
to the traditional characterization of Sita as a dutiful daughter and a
self-negating wife, Sahu’s Sita is bold and gallant who shares a
mother-daughter relationship with the earth. The poet captures the descend of
Sita back into the earth thus:
I was born of you, I
wish to go back to you
The miracle happened,
the redemption
emanated.
earth got divided at my
feet, and a golden
throne arouse
Mother Earth, the Ultimate Woman, arouse
and took me in her lap . . . ” (108)
Padma Bhushan awardee
(2014) Anita Desai was born to a German mother and a Bengali father in Mussorie
in 1937. She is one of the most critically acclaimed Contemporary Indian
English Women Writers. She has several novels to her credit, some of them
include, Cry, The Peacock (1963), Clear
Light of Day (1980), The Village by the Sea: An Indian Family Story (1982), In Custody (1984), Fasting Feasting (1999), The
Zigzag Way (2004) and The Artist of
Disappearance (2011). Desai has received Alberto Moravia Prize (2000),
Benson Medal of Royal Society (2003) and Sahitya Akademi Fellowship (2007) for
her literary marvels. She is also considered the pioneer of psychological novel
in Indian English. The internal conflicts, urges and experiences of the female
protagonists of her novels are deeply influenced by nature. With a novel like Fire on the Mountain (1997) Desai has
also cemented her reputation as an ecofeminist.
Fire on the Mountain is divided into three
parts: “Nanda Kaul at Carignano”, “Raka comes to Carignano” and “Ila Das leaves
Carignano”. The novel revolves around the chief character Nanda Kaul who savors
a life of solitude in her widowed old age in Carignano, a placid but
dilapidated house on a hilltop in Kasauli. Soon, her isolation is compromised
by the arrival of her convalescing great-granddaughter, Raka. Like Kaul, Raka
too eschews human contact and spends most of her time amid nature. In order to
keep Raka engaged, Kaul fabricates a number of glorious stories about her past.
The girl shows a brief interest in conversing with Kaul after which she gets
desperate to escape. Kaul’s serenity is further jeopardized by the entry of her
childhood friend, Ila Das. A garrulous social reformer, Das embodies the antithesis
of Kaul. After being disappointed in Raka, Kaul stops herself from talking
extensively to Das which compels Das to return back to the village. Kaul heaves
a sigh of relief at her friend’s departure but her peace of mind is
short-lived. She receives a call from a police inspector who informs her that
Das has been raped and strangled on her way back home. Kaul is petrified to
hear the news and wishes it to be a lie. She is shattered at the thought that
her desire to be alone drove Das away in the dark of the night who would have
otherwise been safe in her house. In the meanwhile, Raka calls her from outside
to inform that she has set the forest on fire. The novel comes to an end with a
thick smoke spiraling up over the mountain.
Women-Nature Bond in the Novel
The most obvious reading
of a novel that foregrounds a connection between bounties of nature and actions
of women is an ecofeminist one. An ecofeminist reading inevitably implies
exploring the direct bond between women and their natural environment. In this
case, Fire on the Mountain marks a departure. The women-nature relationship in the novel is
equivocal, almost convoluted. Upon fulfilling her duties as a wife and a
mother, Nanda Kaul chooses to live an isolated life on the ridge of a mountain in
Kasauli. She shuns all kinds of human contact and relishes loneliness in her
solitary abode called Carignano. Ecofeminist theory propounds that nature acts
as a rejuvenating stimulant in the dreary lives of women. Desai’s comprehensive
description of the landscape surrounding Carignano and Kaul’s own thought that
“It was the place, and the time of her life− that she had wanted and prepared
all her life” (3) tempts one to think that sumptuousness of nature gratifies
her. However, it is soon informed that “What pleased and satisfied her so, here
at Carignano was its barrenness” (4). Kaul also dismisses the presence of
apricot tress and iris clumps in the vicinity as “incidental, almost
unimportant” and a hoopoe feeding its nestlings as “a sight that did not fill
her with delight” (5). This is in contrast to the presupposition that women
essentially rejoice each and every aspect of nature. Also, her repeated
reference to sterility, stillness and desolation is opposed to fecundity and
life generally associated with women and nature. For example, she fancies to
“merge with the pine tree and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more, no
less was all she was prepared to undertake” (4). In this regard, S. Indira
opines, “Nanda’s sense of identification with the pine trees suggests her
desire for absolute stillness and withdrawal from life” (97).
The Hindu tradition
talks about four age-based stages of a human life: scholar, householder,
retired and ascetic. The last stage is marked by renunciation of material life and
worldly ties in order to attain an introspective life. People in pursuit of
isolation and spirituality usually migrate to remote hermitages or boarding
houses located away from the city-din. Likewise for Kaul phone calls and
letters are “unwelcome intrusion and distraction” (3). Kaul’s occasional
brooding over her past reveals that her life as a wife of a university
Vice-Chancellor and a mother to several children had been quite busy. She
divided her time between “mending clothes, sewing on strings and buttons and
letting out hems” and “instructing the servant girl”, (19). She was extolled by
“the wives and daughters of the lecturers and professors over whom her husband
ruled” for being adept at house-keeping. One of the main reasons behind
associating women and nature is also because both of them are ‘productive’. By
productive it is meant that women not only gather and eat what grows in nature
but they also tender nature to grow them. After performing household chores,
supervising servants, hosting her husband’s guests and nurturing her children
for a considerable part of her life, Kaul completes her duties and in her old
age takes refuge in “the sound of cicadas, and the pines, the sight of this
gorge plunging, blood-red, down to the silver plain (21). Thus, one infers that
it is natural for her to willingly lead a secluded life, post-retirement.
Ecofeminists affirm that nature is a source of both leisure and escape for
women. The readers are deluded to believe the same about Nanda Kaul until she
reveals the actual reason behind her living in denial. Towards the end of the
novel, Kaul recalls the excruciating emotional deprivation she suffered due to
the extra-marital affair of her husband and her ungrateful children for whom
she felt no affection or fondness. Thus, Kaul’s guarded existence in a forsaken
corner is more enforced than voluntary:
Nor had her husband loved and
cherished her and kept her like a queen− he had only done enough to keep her
quiet while he carried on a lifelong affair with Miss David, the mathematics
mistress, whom he had not married because she was a Christian but whom he had
loved, all his life loved. And her children− the children were all alien to her
nature. She neither understood nor loved them. She did not live here alone by choice−
she lived here alone because that was what she was forced to do, reduced to
doing. (158)
Raka’s link with nature
is much more complex than Kaul and her character defies an easy categorization.
She is sent to her great-grandmother to recover back her health after a
near-fatal attack of typhoid. The girl is nothing like her name which means the
moon. On the contrary, she is described as “one of those dark crickets that
leap up in fright but do not sing, or a mosquito, minute and fine, on thin,
precarious legs” (43). Raka’s father is a diplomat posted in Geneva thus it
becomes evident that she hails from an affluent family. However, it is soon
revealed that he is a drunkard who thrashes his wife violently and has numerous
affairs outside marriage. Raka recalls cowering in fear at her father’s abusive
behavior as a young girl. Consequently, the girl grows up hating her father and
pitying her bed-ridden mother. Raka mostly avoids talking to Kaul but eagerly
chatters with the cook, Ram Lal who informs her about the “big party of the
summer season” (73). Though he confirms that post-colonial army revelry is
quite different from the ball dance of the colonizers yet curiosity drives Raka
to see for herself, the said night of carousing. The scene of the cantonment
party leaves her flabbergasted, “There was no vision of kings and queens in a
rosy court. To the heated drumming of the band, madmen and rioters leapt,
bowed, swayed and jigged, costumes flying, paper horns blowing. It was lunacy
rampant. Raka held her head between her hands, she thought it would crack in
two” (75). Raka is appalled at the sight of a “woman with a bucket on her head”
who “laughed in bubbles of blood”, a figure with “skull and crossbones in white
upon his chest”, an “outsized monkey with a stiff, curling tail” and a “lady
mouse” who “was being chased by a man who had his hair combed down over his
eyes and wore a scarf around his neck like a noose before it is tightened”
(76). The party represents the material world which reminds Raka of the
brutalities of her father and mental wreckage of her mother. Thus, Raka’s avid
involvement with the landscape, valley, sunrise, trees and animals is
indicative of her seeking in nature a break from her dreadful past. Just when
the readers become confident that unlike Kaul, Raka is a recluse by choice and
feels immense exhilaration in the lap of nature, she sets the forest on fire.
Her act of burning the forest is open to multiple interpretations. The charred
trees and burnt Pasteur Institute for psychiatric patients, a colonial bastion
for curing mental disorders symbolize Raka’s smashing traditional conformities,
existing systems and sites of male violence. The fire can be seen as an
objective correlative to Raka’s distraught emotions and inner dissension. It
can also be considered a way by which Raka tries to awaken Kaul’s sensibilities
that by distancing others, she was rejecting a part of herself that secretly
craved for companionship. All the above elucidations share one thing in common,
i.e. Raka’s relationship with nature vacillates between constructive and
destructive.
The presence of Ila Das, a piano
teacher turned social welfare worker in the neighboring villages is short yet
crucial to the plot. Das is Kaul’s childhood friend who once belonged to a
thriving family but is now forced to eke out a meager living due to her wastrel
brothers. She is projected as a diminutive and ludicrous old lady whose
greatest tragedy in life is her voice. Kaul loathes Das’s screeching voice
which the former feels is “like a long nail frantically scratching at the glass
pane, or a small child gone berserk and prattling on and on in a voice no one
could hear without cringing” (22). Upon knowing the arrival of Raka at
Carignano, Das decides to meet both the women but even her walk up the mound is
full of “Whooping and hooting, munching and mooing of schoolboys” (118). Das
may be caricatured for comical effect but she supplies the most important
insights about human life in the novel. Das is deprived of her share in the family’s
wealth and is also given the responsibility of her ailing mother but she is not
an escapist like Kaul. Her becoming a social worker further highlights that
apart from personal relations, she believes in community service also. She
rues, “‘how helpless our upbringing made us, Nanda. We thought we were being
equipped with the very best−French lessons, piano classes, English governess−my,
all that only to find it left us helpless, positively handicapped (139). The rant is suggestive of the snobbery of upper-class
women who fail to inculcate in them humanity and ethical values. Das’s
character is explicitly located at the cusp of nature and culture. She
oscillates between both the worlds but does not assimilate in either. On the
one hand, she fulfils her obligation as a social worker by stopping the child
marriage of Preet Singh’s daughter and on the other she thinks about being a
peasant and “Grow a pumpkin vine, keep a goat, pick up kindling in the forest
of fire” (139). On the same night, while returning back from Kaul’s house Das
is murdered and raped by an enraged Preet Singh. Her reformist venture
culminates in a painful death, “Crushed back, crushed down into the earth, she
lay raped, broken, still and finished (156). Das’s effort to impart education to
village women and interference in customary practices like child marriage
(nature’s attempt to enter into the domain of culture) disturbs the established
patriarchal order of the village and is met with a macabre end (culture’s
infliction of violence upon nature). This episode is significant as it brings
out yet another ambivalence in women-nature relationship. A common parallel
drawn between women and nature is that both succumb to male forces, silently.
Das does not let Preet Singh overpower her immediately. She staggers but
retaliates, “She struggled, chocking, trying to stretch and stretch and stretch
that gasp till it became a shout, a shout that the villagers would hear . . .”
(155). Nagpal rightly observes, “The woman protagonists are portrayed as victims
of an aberrant urban milieu, patriarchal family structures and bourgeoisie,
bureaucratic, imperialist, colonized social scenario. It is in this context
that the characters are in a state of revolt, despondency, morbidity and are
driven to grapple with duality, fragmentation.” (49)
Conclusion
Fire on the Mountain disrupts the
nature-culture dualism in favor of foregrounding a more realistic and dynamic
relationship between women and nature. The characterization of women in the
novel urges the readers to look at them as multifaceted beings who perform
numerous roles and thus posses pluralistic opinions on environment and its
conservation which do not necessarily have to be ‘feminine’. The ecofeminist
assumption that women are more ‘connected’ to nature is problematic because
interlocking system like food chains and food web connect each and every living
creature to nature. The second aspect of their being more ‘sensitive’ needs a
closer analysis as it perpetuates same gender stereotypes that are vehemently
opposed by the feminists. It is also important to note that as academically
accomplished, professional women residing in urban centers, millennial women
have as much right over cities as nature. Therefore, it is obstructionist to
align women to nature without reflecting on the gender-class-caste complex that
moulds their experiential and ecological perspectives. Environmentalist, ecocritics
and ecofeminists intend to devise ethical guidelines to promote a cleaner and
greener environment. The endeavor might succeed in stirring the consciousness
of people and producing the desired result but an uncritical privileging of
women’s bodily functions to justify the hypothesis of ecofeminism certainly
needs a revision.
Works Cited
Primary Source
Desai, Anita. Fire on the Mountain. New Delhi: Vintage
Books, 2012. Print.
Secondary Sources
Anderson, Elizabeth.
“Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 10.3 (1995): 50-84.
Print.
Biehl, Janet. Rethinking Ecofeminist Politics. Boston:
South End Press, 1991. Print.
Gadgil, Madhav and
Ramachandra Guha. Ecology and Equity:
The Use and Abuse of Nature in
Contemporary India. New Delhi: Oxford UP, 1995. Print.
Griffin, Susan. Women and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her.
New York: Harper and Row, 1978. Print.
Indira, Sivanna. Anita Desai as an Artist: A Study in Image
and Symbol. New Delhi: Creative Books, 1994. Print.
Kaur, Gurpreet. “Women,
Animals and Violence: Anita Desai’s Fire
on the Mountain and Lee Yew Leong’s “Honey, I’m Off To Be A Jellyfish Now.”
The Journal of Ecocriticism: A New Journal of Nature, Society and
Literature 8.1 (2018): 1-9.Print.
Lee, Janet and Jennifer
Saaser-Coen. Blood Stories: Menarche and
the Politics of the Female Body in Contemporary U.S. Society. New York:
Routledge, 1996. Print.
Nagpal, B.R.
“Existential-Spiritual Quest in Anita Desai’s Fire on the Mountain.” Roman
Critical Context: Anita Desai’s Fire
on the Mountain. Kolkata: Roman Books, 2014. 49-60. Print.
Sahu, Nandini. Sita (A Poem). New Delhi: The Poetry
Society of India, 2015. Print.
Sandiland, Kate.
“Ecofeminist and Its Discontent: Notes Towards Political Diversity.” The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy 8.2 (1991): 90-96. Print.
Shiva, Vandana. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival
in India. New Delhi: Kali for Women, 1988. Print.
Plumwood, Val. “Women,
Humanity and Nature.” Radical Philosophy
(1998):16-24. Web. 21 June 2019.
No comments :
Post a Comment
We welcome your comments related to the article and the topic being discussed. We expect the comments to be courteous, and respectful of the author and other commenters. Setu reserves the right to moderate, remove or reject comments that contain foul language, insult, hatred, personal information or indicate bad intention. The views expressed in comments reflect those of the commenter, not the official views of the Setu editorial board. рдк्рд░рдХाрд╢िрдд рд░рдЪрдиा рд╕े рд╕рдо्рдмंрдзिрдд рд╢ाрд▓ीрди рд╕рдо्рд╡ाрдж рдХा рд╕्рд╡ाрдЧрдд рд╣ै।