SetuVolume 10; Issue 1; June 2025Setu PDF Archives EditorialPoetrySpecialAuthor of the MonthPhoto Essay: Manhole Covers of EuropeTranslation: Poems on EnvironmentPerforming the Text/s: Author ReadingsLong FictionCritical PaperVerse Novel: Chapter FourBook Review
Setu Video SeriesSetu Initiative: Setu Series of Virtual Readings (Facebook Page)
|
** ISSN 2475-1359 **
* Bilingual monthly journal published from Pittsburgh, USA :: рдкिрдЯ्рд╕рдмрд░्рдЧ рдЕрдоेрд░िрдХा рд╕े рдк्рд░рдХाрд╢िрдд рдж्рд╡ैрднाрд╖िрдХ рдоाрд╕िрдХ *
Setu, June 2025
Setu Special Edition: June 2025
Special Edition: Abstract Articulations
Special Edition Authors: June 2025
Poetry: Aparna Pradhan
![]() |
| Aparna Pradhan |
Special Edition: Namita Rai
![]() |
| Namita Rai |
Poetry: Pramod Rastogi
![]() |
| Pramod Rastogi |
Pramod Rastogi
“Bodily Struggles and Societal Silences: Examining Marginalized Women in Kamala Das’ Short Stories”
| Vaishali Suyal |
Abstract
Kamala Das, being
one of the pioneers in Indian feminist writings, has advocated for
women’s identity and rights. Her works, especially short stories, offer a
powerful medium to examine women’s issues concerning personal autonomy and
patriarchal expectations. Her short stories are poignant narratives elevating
grave issues of human trafficking, prostitution, sexual assault, betrayal and
adultery.
The paper is an
attempt to highlight the body struggles faced by women and the associated
marginalization. It also investigates the absence of choices and agency for
these women, often arising due to societal silences.
Keywords: Kamala Das, Short Stories, Marginalized Women, Husband-wife, Prostitute.
Introduction
![]() |
| Kamala Das Surayya |
Kamala
Das, also known as Madhavikutty, was born in a conservative Hindu (Nair) family
on March 31, 1934, in Punnayurkulam, Thrissur district, Kerala. Hailing from a
well-known family, she was the daughter of a celebrated poet, Nalapat Balamani
Amma, and V.M. Nair, an automobile company executive. Her childhood traversed
between Kerala and Calcutta, where her father worked. She was just 15 years old
when she was wed to Madhava Das, a banking executive. Although the marital
alliance wasn’t a fruitful one. She writes in My Story:
“My cousin asked me why I was cold and frigid. I did not know what
sexual desire meant, not having experienced it even once. ‘Don’t’ you feel any
passion for me?’ he asked me. ‘I don’t know,’ I said simply and honestly. It
was a disappointing week for him and for me. I had expected him to take me in
his arms and stroke my face, my hair, my hands, and whisper loving words. I had
expected him to be all that I wanted my father to be, and my mother. I wanted
conversation, companionship and warmth. Sex was far from my thoughts. I had
hoped that he would remove with one sweep of his benign arms the loneliness of
my life…” (80).
The
short stories of Das— “The Princess of Avanti”, “Padmavati the Harlot”, “A Doll
for the Child Prostitute”, “The Young Man with a Pitted Face”, and “A Little
Kitten”, analyzed in the paper—paint the canvas of the repressive social
structures and their functioning. These short stories collectively frame her
anthology Padmavati the Harlot & Other Stories, first
published in 1994. Jai Shankar Tiwari states Das discusses Indian womanhood
through the network of her short stories by deftly utilizing the confessional
mode (38). The characters of Das celebrate womanhood, question self-identity,
and demand a personal space for themselves. Thus, Das becomes the flag bearer
for these destitute women through her bold yet empathetic writings.
The
oppressive patriarchal norms rooted in the society affect and control the women
all across in their own way. The women in these stories struggle not only with
their bodies but also have a tough time handling the silenced approach of
the society. “The Princess of Avanti” isn’t the story of a princess or her
magnificent palace but of an old woman who identifies herself as the ‘Princess
of Avanti’. The woman is a nameless character who is greeted by three imposter
men, and as the story moves further, they exploit her sexually to the extent
that she dies.
Throughout
her life, the old woman attended to the needs of her family. She only desired
love and attention from her daughter-in-law, but all she did was pack her lunch
and send her to the park. The false sense of dignity and abandonment takes
hold of the old woman as she completely trusts three unknown men. She interacts with them for the first time “‘Have I met you before?’ the
old woman asked. ‘No, we are new here,’ said the man. ‘This young man is the
king of Vangarajya. The other is the king of Kerala. I am the ruler of Kalinga.”
(11).
With growing age, the old woman is not able to come in terms with the
reality but she finds an escape through it by acknowledging herself as ‘Princess of Avanti’. The young men who were befitting
to be her sons appear before her as husbands. They dupe her into believing that
they have travelled all the way just to attend her wedding “We want you to
select one of us as your husband.” (11).
The men were sane enough to prevent the heinous task of ripping off a
woman’s dignity, though the old lady suffered from an
identity crisis; keeping this in mind, the men
hatched a plan. Under the pretext of celebrating her wedding, they asked
her “‘This evening you must not go home. Remain hidden behind a bush.
After the park is locked we shall climb over the wall and come to you. We can
celebrate your wedding quietly inside this beautiful park.’” (11).
The bout of madness took over the woman as soon as she heard of getting
married. The men knew what they were about to do was ethically incorrect; however,
they were endowed with animal instincts. They discussed the future implications
of their callous actions “‘Suppose she cries?’ asked the tall one. ‘I can
prevent that,’ said the second. ‘She desires you,’ said the third.” (11).
With
the fall of dusk, the young men reunite again to plunder the soul and purity of
the old woman. Unaware of the things happening, she informed them about
her not being the princess and her disinterestedness in getting married. Still,
nothing stopped the perverts from forcing themselves on the old woman. In a
vulnerable tone she requested them not to hurt her further but her loud shrieks
of pain made no impact on them “‘Oh, you hurt me
terribly,’ the woman cried out. ‘I cannot bear this pain. Do not bite me to
death.’ She struggled to free herself from their grip.” (12).
The old
woman was sidelined by her family when she expected their love and support the
most, but to them she had no feasibility. The self-assumed identity of Princess
Avanti shows that she craved importance and dignity, which everyone around her
failed to give.
Padmavati,
the middle-aged prostitute, is the eponymous character in “Padmavati the
Harlot”. Standing at the brink of her life, she realized that she devoted
thirty-three years to looking after her family. Firstly, she tended to the
paralyzed mother for seven years, and after her death, she met the expenses of
her brothers’ education and her sister’s marriage. It all came as a bundle of
responsibility for Padmavati. The brothers got good jobs in other cities and
never bothered to remember her. Sister, after settling well in her married
life, never stayed in touch with her.
She never complained to anyone about anything in her life for she
believed “Who can blame them? Who will want to consort with a woman like me?”
(17). The
profession of selling her body to strangers landed her in the world of
loneliness, although everything she did was for the sake of her own family. But
no one really bothered for her as a woman, and she felt lovelorn throughout her
life. Love and acknowledgement from loved ones and respect from society were
her only expectations, yet all she got was contempt and hatred. The world failed to understand her efforts, and she finally submitted
herself to the Lord:
“She felt the warmth of His body against her own. She closed her eyes in
ecstasy. At dawn, she left the precincts of the shrine and walked down the
steps with her hair dishevelled and her blouse torn in places. She blushed like
a bride when the young men at the foot of the hill came near her and looked at
her face. There were bruises on her cheeks and on her white throat. Her lips
were swollen and blue. There was fatigue in her eyes. She hid her face behind her
long hair and walked fast. The young men let her pass, bowing before her and murmuring,
Mother, go in safety, give us your blessings and go your way…” (19).
Rukmani
was very young when she was left to the care of her mother and stepfather.
Childhood is the most delicate phase of a child; unfortunately, this phase of
Rukmani turns out to be the scariest nightmare in “A Doll for the Child
Prostitute”. Abandoned by her father, she is raped by her stepfather and
further exploited by the Inspector sahib “‘Come to
me, my moppet,’ he pleaded, his
voice thickening with lust.” (86).
The
condition worsens when Rukmani is sold by her mother at a brothel that is owned
by Lachmi Bai, aka Ayee. Prior to her marriage, Anasuya, the mother of Rukmani,
was also one of the residents of the brothel. She holds an extramarital affair
with a man younger than her age and this illicit relationship with the younger
man becomes the cause of her daughter’s molestation “‘You ought not to have sent away the good man I married you off to,
Anasuya,’ said Ayee. ‘He was a steady fellow and he never drank. But you lusted
for a younger one. Are you satisfied now?’” (59).
Frequent
molestation, harassment, and rape attempts on Rukmani compel Anasuya to sell
her daughter in a brothel, though the primary reason is the newborn baby of
Anasuya. Due to her poor financial condition, Anasuya is not able to raise the
child properly “Anasuya rolled the dirty currency notes in a paper and
tucked the roll into her waist. ‘I would not have taken any money from you,
Ayee,’ she said, a sob rising in her throat, ‘but we are practically starving
at home. The baby is given nothing but tea and maybe a banana at noon.’” (59).
Sita,
Mira, and Saraswati are the other inmates who accompany Rukmani in the brothel.
Rukmani, as a child, was helpless to decide her future; her only desire was to
get love from her family. It is clearly reflected in the story when
she embraces the Inspector Sahib, addressing him as Papa. She feels the warmth
and affection in his presence that she fails to get otherwise “Then Rukmani for the first time after her friend’s death, broke down.
She rushed towards the man and hid her sobbing face in the bushy growth of hair
on his deep chest. ‘Papa, Papa,’ she called out, sobbing, while the man,
stupefied beyond words, kept stroking her curly hair. ‘Oh papa, take me away
from here,’ she said, ‘Otherwise I too will die…’” (86).
Sita was the go-to person who made Rukmani happy; however, Sita’s
untimely death left her soul shattered. Cholera devoured Sita’s family long
ago, leading her to be sold at the brothel by one of the villagers. The
frequent exploitation by the visitors leaves her pregnant, although she hoped
for a natural life away from the world of fleshmongers, desiring freedom “Leaning
against the bars of the porch, Sita said to her friend: ‘Look at the sky this
afternoon, it is like a whitewashed wall. Once upon a time I lived in a house
with white walls. Every year during Diwali, my father whitewashed our walls
with lime and powdered sand.’” (70).
Mira,
just like Rukmani, longs for a dignified life and love. She falls in love with
a college student whom she addresses as Krishna. Although the poor fellow has
no money, he sells his pen to meet her. Then one fine day they get married to
each other and elope. When they are caught, the boy is beaten brutally. Later,
Mira is abandoned by the boy. The affair is short-lived, as the story,
which blossomed with love, ended on the verge of lust being fulfilled. Vinothkumar and Daniel note Das’ opinion on love and lust in the system
of marriage:
“Kamala Das has admitted that there
is ‘lot of love’ in her poems. She wrote, Love is beautiful, whatever
four-lettered name the puritans call it by. It is the foretaste of paradise. It
is the only pastime that involves the soul. She is not a poet of free love. On
the contrary, she upholds the sanctity of domestic love and marital
relationship. But she is disheartened when marital love degenerates into lust,
when marital relationship turns into one of domination by the male over the
female. Her poems are fierce expression of the emotionalism caused by
frustration when love turns into its opposite solely because of male
insensitivity and self-centredness.” (14).
Inspector Sahib and Lachmi Bai
were instrumental in the oppression of Rukmani and Sita. The protector of the law had become the
predator, even though he should have been concerned about the safety of all the
women in the brothel. But instead, he was searching for young girls to satisfy
his own thirst. Mira's abandonment by her lover after marriage signifies that a
prostitute is never meant for marriage, which is asserted by the Inspector
“‘Why would a decent boy marry a prostitute?” (78).
“The Young Man with a Pitted Face” is the story of a dying woman, a
young man, and their one-month-old relationship. He was the most charming man
she had ever come across. The woman lay in the hospital battling with all sorts
of diseases, though her deteriorating health scared her at times:
“She had during the past fortnight two major operations and the cardiac
condition which had worried her doctor, had remained. Her womb, that had lain
fallow, had grown fibroids just as a desert may grow cacti and carnivorous plants.
Her liver had adhesions. Her intestines, not to be outdone, had developed
tuberculosis. All this and the weak heart had in those recent months drained
her of whatever beauty she had left. The chloroquine that was administered
regularly made her colour as dark as quinine.” (26).
The man used to visit her in the hospital after the evening visitors’
departure. She knew she wouldn’t be able to live long so she thought “If she
survived she would return to the narrow confines of her brown body and the
little flat with the blue brocade curtains and her favourite bronzes but if she
slipped out of the surgeon’s hands silently, beautifully, she would be free;
she would have the universe with its celestial furnishings as her home.” (26-27).
Vinothkumar
and Daniel comment with regard to the poems of Das that it not only centralizes
on love and lust but it also covers the other aspects of human life, i.e.,
death, decay and illness. Lust is the parameter which affects woman and man,
creating resentment in the former and brutality in the latter, ultimately
destructing the inner spirit (15).
The young man was the only blessing in the woman’s life. His presence
made her feel so comfortable that she fell in love with him. Although the man
wasn’t sure about his feelings, as he was a married man. Moreover, what could
he get from an ailing and diseased woman? He never showed that he loved her but
was simply concerned, or maybe not. The dialogue delivered by Dev Mathur in Jalebi
movie released under Vishesh films is apt to describe the situation of sick
woman “Unse mohabbat kamaal ki hoti hai, jinka milna mukaddar mein hi nahi
hota” (“That love
is out of the world…Those who are never supposed to be together”; my trans.;
0:07-16).
The
only things desired by the woman were love and attention, and the promise on
behalf of the young man to meet was the only hope keeping her alive, albeit he
had no time to spare for her. With all the illness and ugliness followed with
the procedures and treatment, she wanted to feel beautiful and to be loved so
she never failed to adorn herself as a woman “And yet,
being a woman, nothing but a woman, she rubbed lipstick on her blue lips and
washed her hair every day to leave it smelling sweet.” (26).
The man never turned up to her; though lying on her deathbed, she only
hoped to see him once. He should have known his limits before
approaching the woman and coaxing her with false hopes. She hadn’t envisioned life without him even after death, as she imagines
“She would be in the wind, in the sea, in the rain, in the sand on the beach
where the young man walked with his wife. And at night, the young man would
tell his wife the winds are cold and sharp today, close the window, and without
knowing that she was at the window the wife would shut it and lie against his
body.” (27).
The
man’s response was everything that she should have understood long ago;
however, she was too na├пve to interpret it. He meant what he said to her, as
not even pity moved him an inch towards her. He started ignoring her under the
pretext of being busy instead of conveying it was only sympathy rather than
love. The man was a shallow person who visited her aimlessly in the hospital
despite having a wife. When she questioned him, he replied in vagueness “If he could love her, her eyes full and her mouth pale, he would look
down at his shoes and say, you know what you mean to me.” (27). She died
without acknowledging that he never wanted to continue with the relationship.
“A Little Kitten” is the tale of a happily married couple living in a
small flat at Dadar. The husband is a working man, and the wife is a homemaker.
Staying at home made the wife feel miserable and lonely in his absence. She
demands a little kitten, but her demands are overlooked. It seems as if the
husband is only concerned with his satisfaction and happiness “And, he threw
back his head and laughed. What a sweet and innocent creature he had married!
He tickled her until she rolled over on their double bed and screamed out for
mercy. You are killing me, please stop, PLEASE STOP. Then, he began to lick her
toes, mumbling, you see, I am your kitten, I am your little kitten.” (31).
The
essence of the relationship soon faded and paved the way for frequent quarrels.
The husband’s involvement with his secretary, Miss Nadkar, added further spice
to it. The unanswered questions and the unspoken silences drove the woman
crazy. It started affecting their relationship badly as Miss Nadkar became an
indispensable part of it. The intricacies of the husband-wife relationship are
expressed in the poem “The Testing of the Sirens”:
“I
am happy. He really was lavish with words.
I am happy, just being with you.
But you . . . you love another,
I know, he said, perhaps a handsome man,
a young and handsome man.”
The
wife only longed for affection and extra time from her husband, albeit Miss
Nadkar was showered with all the attention by the boss morally, which was the
wife’s right. Not only this, he even started comparing Miss Nadkar with
his wife “He gave for the first time a birthday gift to his
secretary because he had begun to compare her with his petulant little wife.”
(32). When all the attempts of the wife failed to get her husband on her side,
she gave up on him and found solace in some other man.
Conclusion
In the
story “Princess of Avanti”, an old woman is brutally killed in the society’s
park; strangely, neither did anyone pay attention nor was she rescued.
Ironically, law and order didn’t exist for either the victim or the accused, as
the men killed the woman with no remorse after raping her. The society where
she lived turned a deaf ear towards her helplessness; no one safeguarded her,
not even her family. The only crime committed on the part of the old woman
was that she failed to reckon with her true self.
“Padmavati
the Harlot” shares the age-old saga of women trapped in the cobwebs of family
responsibility. Padmavati, with no formal education in hand, takes up the job
of selling herself to the strangers unwillingly. Owing to her profession,
everyone resents her, including the family for whom she didn’t even hesitate to
trade her dignity. Throughout, she struggled with the stigma attached to her
profession; her decision to quit the old ways of living wasn’t welcomed by the
society, as for them, she was a prostitute who had a past but no future.
“A Doll
for the Child Prostitute” draws attention to the absence of choices not
only for the women but also for the children. Rukmani and Sita, at a tender age
of playing hopscotch, are sold to Lachmi Bai, where Sita had little agency,
unlike Rukmani. Sindhuthai and Koushalya were aware of the consequences of
subjecting a minor to the life of prostitution; still, there was little they
could have done about it.
The act
of Anasuya is sufficiently satirical, being a mother, where she drags Rukmani
at the doorsteps of a brothel to deter further exploitation caused by her
lover. Rukmani became the source of earnings to meet the expenses of Anasuya’s
other child. Only if Anasuya had no other child would she have raised
concern for her daughter’s molestation, or who knows, even then she could have
bargained for her. Anasuya would have looked for deviant ways for her
daughter’s safety, but she found it easier to sell her
daughter. Emphasizing the short stories of Kamala Das, K. T. Sunitha
remarks:
““A Doll for the Child Prostitute” and “Padmavathi, the Harlot” are both
stories of considerable importance insofar as its materialist emphasis makes
visible the embodied existences of mainly deprived women, and highlights the
ways in which those existences have been, and continue to be, largely framed by
masculinist assumptions and patriarchal agenda which must be questioned if
women are going to accrue the right to self-determination. Kamala Das has by
the gradual accretion of detail and resonance reveals a deep engagement with
some of the most profound questions regarding the place of the woman in the
patriarchal world” (177-78).
“The
Young Man with a Pitted Face” explores the thoughtless and selfless love
between a dying woman and a young man. The woman needed her husband the most
during her crucial time, but his neglect makes her vulnerable. Due to her state
of illness, the woman falls passionately in love with the young man and dies.
“A Little Kitten” criticizes the fraudulence of a husband who enjoys himself by
ignoring his wife. The wife, who was dependent on him, had no autonomy of hers.
The
middle-aged woman, old woman, sick woman, married woman, and young woman find a
resolute place in Kamala Das' short stories that leave behind readers to ponder
over certain things. She painstakingly captures the images of these women to
mark their struggles, ostracization shaped by the silences of society.
Works Cited
Das, Kamala. “A Doll for the Child Prostitute.” Padmavati the Harlot
& Other Stories. Aleph Book Company, 2020.
---. “A Little Kitten.” Padmavati the Harlot & Other Stories.
Aleph Book Company, 2020.
---. “Padmavati the Harlot.” Padmavati the Harlot & Other
Stories. Aleph Book Company, 2020.
---. “The Princess of Avanti.” Padmavati the Harlot & Other
Stories. Aleph Book Company, 2020.
---. “The Young Man with a Pitted Face.” Padmavati the Harlot &
Other Stories. Aleph Book Company, 2020.
---. My Story. Harper Collins Publishers India, 2019.
---.
“The Testing of the Sirens.” Summer in Calcutta. Poetry Nook. www.poetrynook.com/poem/testing-sirens. Accessed 1 May, 2025.
SUNITHA,
K.T. “POSITION OF WOMEN IN THE SHORT STORIES OF SUBHADRA SEN AND KAMALA
DAS.” Indian English Literature, 2007, vol. 5, pp. 166-79. Google
Books, www.google.co.in/books/edition/Indian_English_Literature/PHCZ0z0P5mwC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=POSITION+OF+WOMEN+IN+THE+SHORT+STORIES+OF+SUBHADRA+SEN+AND+KAMALA+DAS.+Indian+English+Literature&pg=PA166&printsec=frontcover.
Accessed 25 Apr. 2025.
Tiwari,
Jai Shankar. A Study in the Short Stories of Kamala Das. Shanlax
International Journal of English, vol. 8, no. 3, June 2020, pp. 37-41.
https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v8i3.3225.
Accessed 21 Apr. 2025.
Vinothkumar, G., R. D. Nelson Daniel. “LOVE-LUST-FRUSTRATION
IN THE POEMS OF KAMALA DAS.” Hankering in Literature, Shanlax
Publications, 2023, pp. 13-19. Google Books, www.google.co.in/books/edition/Hankering_in_Literature/m6C9EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%E2%80%9CWhile+her+sensibility+seems+to+be+obsessively+preoccupied+with+love+and+lust,+it+finds+love+invariably+petering+out+into+lust,+and+lust+merely+eating+itself+to+the+point+of+nausea%E2%80%9D&pg=PA13&printsec=frontcover. Accessed
1 May, 2025.
Vishesh Films. “Jalebi | Official Trailer | Rhea | Varun | Digangana | Pushpdeep Bhardwaj | 12th Oct.” YouTube, 10 Sept. 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=exF94JTVy8k. Accessed 30 Apr. 2025.
The Schedule of V├нhaan
![]() |
| John Clark Smith |
4 Rivalries
Wherein we learn
how the name ‘Machiavelli’ comes in handy,
Carina’s attitude toward Hut├бn,
the rivalry of Selma and Gillian,
the origin of the counter blood,
Selma’s deadly game,
the fate of Rohan
Some might
claim—but not Aristotle, Hut├бn would point out—[1]
the numerous
dangers to Hut├бn on the island were
unlucky or “bad”
luck; yet that was a limited view.
Who could
prophesy or arrogate exhaustive knowledge
of the way things
work? Good and bad luck were thus unstable
and always caused
incidentally, though each had a cause
and didn’t arise
without purpose. Some day Hut├бn
knew he would
perceive his presence here as incidental
to a grander
causal event occurring because he was here,
inspiring him to
revisit the tape of George from which
he noticed
immediately an unusual event
at the place of
the blood sample, a mystery that grew
more intriguing
when he returned to that same location
on the counter
and discovered fresh blood spots oozing out
from the marble
beside another crack where the blood
of Mustfarris
originated and streamed out evenly,
both cracks
allowing only a tiny amount of blood
to stream but
both cracks draining to a similar exit
in the marble,
raising the question: From where did they come?
He followed the
tube around the room until it ended
or began at a
wall and went through the wall near to which
was a door—not
the door from which he entered or which Wink
was guarding—a
door, he thought, that might lead to another
space into which
the counter passed or stopped, these clues all
quickly forming
several directions in Hut├бn’s mind,
particularly due
to the absence of Pitworthy:
First, the
invitation could be a ruse. Pitworthy had
never invited
him, someone was manipulating
him because he
was a significant Remnant person,
someone like
Selma Whitmani—the Remnant’s nemesis
and brain behind
Hydra’s determined quest for The Schedule
and the abduction
of V├нhaan—may first have extorted
or captured
Pitworthy or done something to flex muscles
with a threat or
trap, perhaps as a bargaining approach
for V├нhaan who,
as far as Hut├бn knew, was under Hydra’s
control. If this
was true, then Selma had also been here
and left the
three poisons—the green liquid, the counter slime,
and gas—as
threats she must have assumed Hut├бn would detect.
Or Second, a
similar series might point to the mark
of Dvorak,
especially one of Dvorak’s two
key brains and
eyes, Leonard Frig and Gillian Zorotas.
Gillian, the
original buyer of The Schedule,
had assumed that
Rohan, V├нhaan’s friend and business partner,
was the
inventor—one critical action of Rohan
was to keep
V├нhaan’s identity secret long enough
for V├нhaan to
alert Hut├бn, because if she had known
V├нhaan was the
key mind, Gillian would have kidnapped him
and all would
have changed—but when Rohan tried to mitigate
his mistake and
take back The Schedule, the gas filled his lungs
and killed him
soon after in San Sebastian. Once again,
can we ask if
this accident was bad luck for Dvorak
and Gillian? Or
was it not a result of extreme
paranoia
that someone might steal The Schedule and take
something that
was never their own from the start? Hut├бn would
say they were
ignorant of the words of Epictetus,
“When you seek
earnestly that which is not your own, you lose
that which is
your own;”[2]
and what they lost was V├нhaan’s respect
and trust,
because the death of Rohan not only surpassed
feelings of anger
and sorrow, regardless of motive,
and hammered a
wedge of hurt of Vihaan toward Dvorak,
it showed how
nervous Dvorak was about The Schedule,
so nervous that
they protected it with deadly gas
and transported
it through Prince Andres, whom they were certain
would be an
unexpected courier, a clever plan
if Rohan had died
sooner—again Dvorak taking
what was not
their own—and hadn’t seen Prince Andres talking
with Gillian when
he sold the Schedule, and then texted
that information
to V├нhaan before he threw his phone
into the fountain
and repeated the information
to Hut├бn,
allowing Carina to steal the Schedule,
an event that
clearly infuriated Gillian
and made her more
determined to reacquire it, since she
mistakenly
assumed Hydra somehow was the real group
behind the
theft—an assumption and lie Carina fed
to Andres—and because
Selma, Gillian’s rival, worked
for Dvorak once
and left not because of Dvorak
but because she
hated Gillian. Yet when Gillian
discovered the
Schedule’s gifts, and Rohan foolishly bragged,
if you don’t want it, there are the others
and the others
were Hydra, the Remnant, and nation-states—
groups about
which Rohan knew nothing but had overheard
mentioned by
V├нhaan—Gillian knew she had to have it.
Third, Mustfarris
or Aaron arrived at the castle first
and they were
injured or someone shed or brought their blood
or they were
injured somewhere else, raising the question next:
How did the blood
initially end up in the counter?
And the immediate
answer, and not so surprising,
was that either
someone without compassion wanted him
to notice or,
upon reflection, perhaps someone had
poisoned the
blood itself, with the bold scheme Hut├бn might brush
his finger
against it, which he hadn’t—and the trickster
suspected perhaps
Hut├бn might also call this cunning—
so Hut├бn analyzed
the blood again, and there George found
a micro-message
in the blood, which once unencrypted
read: ‘thank you
and Carina for accepting my invite,
will exchange
V├нhaan for The Schedule, coming soon, Selma;’
a message that
seemed to make too little sense to Hut├бn.
If Hydra had
V├нhaan, why would they need The Schedule chip?
Was V├нhaan only a
lure or trap? Which left the Fourth way:
Dvorak would be
here, as it always was, both watching
and waiting to
snatch again the Schedule and V├нhaan,
perhaps even
Pitworthy if possible, though that scheme
didn’t explain
the message of blood, implying Selma
may indeed have
involved Aaron or Mustfarris, knowing
that Hut├бn alone
had George and could analyze the blood,
hinting toward
the Fifth precarious direction, that both
Hydra and Dvorak
were involved, were here or coming.
All this
information Hut├бn chewed on cautiously as
the Remnant’s
strategic mastermind, leading him to rush
through the door
beside the counter and tube, where he did find
a gagged and
bound human groaning and grimacing, propped up
against the far
end of the counter on the other side
of the wall,
holding a beaker of blood and pouring it
drop by drop
without missing—lest a glistening knife move
straight through
the top of his head—into the tiny mouth
of a funnel
sticking out of two holes in the marble.
Hut├бn released
the knife above the head of Pitworthy,
freed him from
the restraints, caught his body as he collapsed,
and gently placed
him on the floor, his body quivering,
his face red from
anxiety, his nerves shaken, fatigued,
arms numb, neck
limp, sweat covering his arms, chest, and face.
He raged in a
breathless, indignant, impatient tone,
Where were you? I heard someone. Was it you?
I had given up hope, wanted to quit,
and wondered: Why couldn’t you find me? Why?
a fair request from someone struggling with
such tedium
and the pain of hearing a savior in the
other room.
Yet the next question Hut├бn had not anticipated:
And why are you here anyway? Why not
Aaron? Or have you ignored my wishes?
I give millions and I get a brainy
strategist. Ridiculous! Anyway,
she, whoever she was, threatened me, said
one of their goons would torture and kill me
if you didn’t hand over “The Schedule,”
whatever that is or means. And then she
set
up this bizarre torture, not telling
me
whose blood this is and why I’m doing
this,
and then she assures me, ‘Don’t worry,
Hut├бn
will be here; he’ll figure it out.’
You,
not Aaron, you’ll figure it out, you’ll
be
here. And when I heard someone out there,
I
expected she’d be here too, somewhere.
What’s
going on? What kind of a twisted
operation
is this? Are you wanted
by
the police or the feds or some mob?
Hut├бn calmly listened to and stared at a
trembling man
terrified from the ordeal, from his forehead
sweat dripping,
mumbling, how could this happen to me,
how? Hut├бn thinking,
‘How much could I explain without revealing
anything?’
Pitworthy was a patron and patrons were
uninformed,
that was the contract they signed, each of
them recognizing
they are sacrificing to improve the world, a
penance
for what they or their ancestors did to earn
their riches,
though Hut├бn suspected that Pitworthy and
other patrons
must have known the explanations given for
their missions
were a little jejune, since disguising the
secrecy
and operations were part of the deal. So
Hut├бn said,
And
you’re thinking, Why me? But don’t worry.
They
have seen you but they have no idea
you’re
involved in anything, and why should they?
You
don’t know a thing. That’s why you don’t know.
No
one suspects you or your family.
And as he was speaking Hut├бn realized—and
Hut├бn
confessed it should have happened
sooner—that someone’s plan was
working too well, a wily scheme set up for
mockery
and intentionally far more complex than
necessary,
assuming the goal was to lure someone with
The Schedule,
assuming the planner perceived that
Pitworthy, Aaron,
Carina, or Mustfarris didn’t possess the
Schedule,
assuming the culprit needed time, assuming
Hut├бn
would accept the invitation and come. Yet
this tricky
maze required detailed knowledge of the
Remnant, with knowledge
of the members of Remnant, of the group’s
itinerary,
or at least the itinerary of some of its
members,
as if one had the capability of The
Schedule.
Selma wouldn’t have planned the exact scheme
to anyone
who came or was here. Did you see who it was? Hut├бn asked.
Pitworthy replied, as Hut├бn guessed, he only
knew it
was a woman. Very quickly she had grabbed
and dragged him
to the room and propped him at the end of
the black counter.
Pitworthy then began to whimper and scream
out in blame,
I thought I’d never see my family
again. I felt as if she had chained me.
I
would never live in freedom again
‘At least you have a family,’ Hut├бn thought
in some guilt,
‘at least you have someone who depends upon
you and waits
for you, unlike most of those helping you in
the Remnant.’
As for freedom, Hut├бn cynically laughed to
himself
and recalled Aeschylus’ line that no one who
lives is free
except Zeus.[3] He
tried to bury this feeling, nothing’s gained
in thinking about his wife Rita who once
waited for him
but now would wait no more or think about
what could have been.
No time to ponder about the rewards of true
freedom
or whether his life is one of “quiet
desperation.”[4]
For now he needed to create a ‘discontinuous
thought,’ as Udaki called it, a thought
technique that would slow
the process down or see it differently, note
its steps
and bridges so that Hut├бn could understand
it much better
since, beyond the fact that he assumed he
had little time
before the next stage, and as the strategist
of the group,
he couldn’t whine about discomfort or the
fact he had
not anticipated quickly enough this fiasco,
no, not now, now he had to keep his wits and
throw off these
confused feelings, regardless how tense grew
Pitworthy’s whines:
That woman thought I would know, but
what does
she think I know? What is it? She would have
let me die, I’m positive, I felt it.
Since Pitworthy couldn’t know how dangerous
and crucial
The Schedule was, and Pitworthy in his heart
knew
he couldn’t know, Hut├бn would murmur a name
to wake up
and redirect Pitworthy, because he knew the
mention
of this name would baffle and yet gratify
Pitworthy:
Machiavelli. These people follow
Machiavelli, who would recommend
fear and cruelty as tactics useful
for dominance.[5]
This woman was cruel
to you because her company wants our
clients, our products, our information,
and they will do whatever is required
because they presuppose, given free scope,
men will prefer evil. They will do what
works
to get what they want, because it’s a war,
Mister Pitworthy, and you, you’re in their
way, so they use you and anyone else
to get to the next stage because they want
to know what we know. They think I or you
have the document, the list, the secret,
the schedule, whatever; but, no, they had
no wish to let you die. They knew I was
coming, they knew. They just wanted to scare
you and me, that’s all, so no need to fret.
Throwing out the
name of Machiavelli allowed him
to take advantage of their trading company Mannter
Limited, a front where anything goes,
anything is
acceptable. While Pitworthy did like the
adventure
on some level and liked the secrets—though
he imagined
the wrong secrets—he preferred not to die,
so he nodded
and nervously coughed, almost as if Hut├бn
had revealed
everything and the information made him
uneasy,
Pitworthy always sensing Hut├бn’s covert
group may be
about something dangerous that didn’t mesh
in his mind
with his normal life of business and
finance, a life
of Birkenstock sandals, plaid shirts, khaki
pants, black, horn-rimmed
glasses. In fact, Pitworthy believed it best
not to know,
since the end of such knowledge, he recalled
from a prior
conversation with Hut├бn, could become the
twisted fate
of Jacopo, the elder of the Pazzi family,
a respected Templar in fourteen
seventy-eight—only
a few years after Machiavelli himself was
born—
when along came Fortune[6], and what did Fortune do but hang
Pazzi upside down in the piazza, let his
corpse be
exhumed and ripped apart by unleashed
children, the flesh torn,
its bones abused, dragged through the
streets, its skull used as a door
knocker, the remains thrown in pieces into
the river,
and everyone banished with the name Pazzi
from Florence,
even though Jacopo had done nothing except
assent
against his will to a conspiracy that most,
even
the Pope, approved, a plot to end the
absolutism
of the Medici rule and kill the brothers
Lorenzo
and Giuliano de’ Medici. True, he assented
to stop tyranny but he was aloof from the
killing,
though he did try after the attacks to rally
people
to revolt. Unfortunately for Jacopo, he
failed,
the mob wouldn’t listen to someone like him,
one of the
elite, a member of one of the wealthy
families
whom the mob instinctively despised and
wouldn’t rescue
when their children revenged, and history
turned against him.
So
isn’t history saying—in light
of
these events, concerning whether he
deserved
better than such treatment after
a
reasonably honorable life—
that
such involvement may cost you your life
and
perhaps it’s better not to conspire
but
conduct your life without questioning,
unless
you’re ready to make the sacrifice.
Otherwise,
let others fight tyranny,
let
you and your family remain safe,
let
others see the gruesome details around you,
such as the location of both Mustfarris and
Aaron,
both clearly surprised, tranquilized, bound,
gagged, and quickly dragged
to a closet in the room in which Hut├бn was
standing,
and mercifully, Hut├бn the strategist thought of them
once he comprehended the plan and hoped they
would be near,
knowing that the target of this mockery was
himself,
not Mustfarris or Aaron. Hut├бn started the
search
with Pitworthy’s frantic words still blaring
in his ears
and Hut├бn thinking, ‘How is my work any
different
or subtle from what an ancient or
Renaissance soldier
or spy faced?’ Or is it? Hut├бn always began
by thinking
of those ancient, medieval, and Renaissance
world events,
because to him almost every action and idea
in his life had some deep connection to
those times of old
beyond which the patterns of humanity, he
believed,
seemed unable to step, at which point his
mind once again
drifted to his mother’s stories from
classical authors,
such as Tacitus on the exploits of
Germanicus
—one of the few characters Tacitus seemed to
admire—[7]
who in Hut├бn’s
day would have had a more difficult task.
In the ancient
era there were six: Rome, Byzantium,
Babylonia, an
Achaemenid Empire, a Mongol
realm, and an
Arab Empire, but now there’s also Hydra,
Dvorak, and the
Remnant, secret organizations
that many
ordinary citizens didn’t even
know exist, for
ordinary citizens once believed
the nation-states
comprised the world; and when asked—which no one
ever did—what is
the purpose of the Remnant, Hut├бn
would say, to
offset or diminish—he wouldn’t claim that
they could
eliminate—the potential domination
not only by
nation-states but also by Dvorak
and Hydra, since
each of them was just like an ancient Rome
or an Arab
Empire, yet still so different that should
the Remnant
manage one power, still another remained,
and should the
Remnant attack one of the other forces—
which rarely
happened because the Remnant’s mission was peace—
the others would
know about it and plan accordingly.
Even should he
know who concocted this scheme—though all signs
pointed to Hydra
and Dvorak—he must still reckon
with the great
complexity of defusing it quickly,
because knowledge
alone was insufficient for success
and such a
success would be temporary since, unlike
the Germans
conquered by Germanicus, there’s no pretense
of permanence or
even fear of him and the Remnant.
Its war was so
old, it had been happening, the Remnant
believed, at
least since the dawn of history, and happened
whether or not it
took place with some visible weapons,
a visible enemy,
nations, and diplomacy.
The awareness of
the unending battle had over
time slowly wiped
from his mind the mindless glory of war—
that great bloody
triumph he innocently imagined
when he signed on
to the Remnant and fantasized himself
as a covert
operative in a wall-sized painting
by someone with
an epic sweeping vision of conflict
and majesty, like
Turner—and replaced it with a Bosch
painting of the
saints having no escape from myriad
temptations,
exploitations, deceit, and brutality,
and the
omnipresent evil teeth constantly biting
at the heels of
the good in a house of perversity
and depravity,
the blood dripping off the ripped canvas;
and replacing the
Renaissance perfect polyphony
of Palestrina,
the keyless symmetry of Webern,
the anarchic
dissonance of “Psalm 90” of Ives,
and the silent
anxiety of John Cage’s “4’33”
with the
repetitions of Glass and the complexity
of Carter,
painting and sound with no meaning or purpose.
These were the
dark moments, when he would often beg to know
if “one exception
would have marred too much the pitiless
perfection of the
divine, eternal plan;”[8]
but the dark
moments can bow
down to light, as they did when he opened
the closet and
Aaron’s big eyes woke him from reflection,
though, with his
usual sarcasm and combination
of candor and
petulance that ached for a confrontation
of sorts, Aaron
said in a fake tone of adulation,
with no effect
from the terror he had experienced,
locked and tied
up in the prison of a tiny closet,
Oh my! Look who saves us. I’m
so darn thrilled.
I can’t believe that I’ll be
oh so close
to the great philosopher man
Hut├бn…
—his associates used the sobriquet
“philosopher”
because he frequently tended to quote
philosophers,
…and just in time too, a few minutes more,
we might have been dead. But who would have
cared
as long as great thinker Hut├бn is safe,
worshipped for wondrous exploits of danger.
If a statue of you was near her now,
Carina would smear her blood on it,
to which Hut├бn
smiled and offered a sympathetic look,
to which Aaron
had no retort, since his words and tone hid
his true feelings
of awe for Hut├бn, if for no other
reason—and there
were several other more important
reasons—than he
saw Aaron as a man, not a film star.
Even in the
darkness with Mustfarris, when their backs were
tied to each
other, their arms touched, and their mouths were covered,
he would have
poked fun at Hut├бn if he could have spoken,
just as
Mustfarris whispered Flaubert’s ironic comment,
“il ne faut pas toucher aux idoles:
la dorure en reste aux mains…[9]
for Mustfarris
knew he and everyone in the Remnant
admired Hut├бn,
but he knew Hut├бn’s imperfections too.
Aaron’s sardonic
comment Hut├бn quickly put aside,
for nothing Aaron
could say now would upset him or change
the sense of joy
in seeing them both alive and unharmed,
so glad that he
hugged each of them gently while Pitworthy
smiled as wide as
a human could smile when he saw Aaron
Lee, his favorite
of the Remnant, and thrust forth his hand;
but when Aaron
grabbed his hand, Pitworthy wouldn’t let go
Oh my god, it’s Aaron Lee! So happy
to see you! And you’ve been in the closet?
until Aaron
pulled away from these few effulgent words.
Pitworthy
verified, his smile always fixed on Aaron,
what was becoming
quite clear: He had never asked Hut├бn
to his castle and
had never asked for this gathering.
Several facts
Hut├бn knew: Hydra would exchange V├нhaan
for the Schedule,
Dvorak had set up the three poisons,
Selma created the
torture chamber for Pitworthy
and tied up Aaron
and Mustfarris in the closet,
and The Schedule
was now, in his view, behind all of it.
But before he
could turn his attention to what Hydra
and Dvorak would
do next, Aaron had his own questions.





