Showing posts with label 201904E. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 201904E. Show all posts

Setu, Call for Papers

Another initiative by Setu
An open call for another special edition of June-2019, to be guest-edited by the distinguished academic-scholar-poet-critic Jaydeep Sharangi

CFP

We invite poems, translations of poems (preferably accompanied by the original text), essays/articles, interviews, book reviews (books published in 2018-19) by established and emerging writers on CELEBRATION OF LOCAL.

Sub themes:
The place where you live in
Local rivulet, field, people, culture, etc
Your family, doorways, local tea shop,etc

Please send us your brief bio-note in 3rd person along with a photo in jpeg.
All submissions will be blind reviewed. E mail: spissuesetu@gmail.com
Last date for submissions: MAY 31, 2019

Special Edition: Flash fiction

April continues the tradition of the special editions edited by reputed professionals for specific reading requirements of discerning reading community.

This time the main focus is on flash fiction as a popular literary genre. Flash fiction is being promoted in a big way by mainstream and literary journals---print and online. Responding to the pressures of post-industrial society, this flexi form can sum up the human experience within six words to 1,000 word limit. Challenging task for a writer working within this difficult form. Compression, compassion, empathy, raciness and brevity characterize the domain of micro- story-telling by a talented narrator, adept at maneuvering the narrow alleys and blind turns in order to reach a fixed destination and time. Trending these days is a kindred challenge--- prompt-writing. Whether poetry or prose, a prompt is given and a volunteering author has to fit their works into that framework, sometimes constructed by a one line only. The indefiniteness and elusiveness of the given theme can be both infuriating and liberating for a literary imagination but the entire exercise of building up of a controlled narrative against a tight deadline works as an aphrodisiac.

The aim this time was to put the spot light on the genre of flash fiction that goes by other names as micro or mini or short short or nano fiction. Word count, thematic consistency, evolution of characters, mood/s, atmosphere, situation/s play a crucial role in the delivery of this type that also demands a well-balanced structure and dialogue, developed in a dialectical manner, not static.

Dynamism is the key word here.

Speech too is important. You have to sound every day, not exotic, while delineating the human interactions in relatable contexts and situations that reflect the common realities of a globalised world where, despite different languages, subjectivities and nationalities, we have all come to resemble each other in terms of manipulated choices of clothes, food and cultural consumption through English and media as prevalent international modes of cognition of a frighteningly-similar world; a world where we feel free but are not, being persuaded subliminally by the advertisements, multinationals and TV.

Writers have in various degrees risen to define the scare and delight of such regimented living, masked for majority except the intellectuals involved in decoding  the  civilizational mores.

Fiction---flash and short or long---is ably suited to capture the noise and in authenticity of the mass society and its flashy lifestyle and thereby, enable a reader to quickly identify and claim as their own, the experience of a fictional character.

Fiction becoming real; real, fiction; this artistic and reading process has their own tensions and in-built drama and the ability of such an artifact to elevate the local into the universal is simultaneously, both amazing and empowering. We read works of literature for delight and insights---and comfort and a sense of solidarity as well.

*

This month a fine selection of flash fiction is done by the guest editor Kelli J Gavin, a noted fiction author, widely published. Kelly has done a great job!  She has carefully chosen 17 writers in their top form and the variety of themes, styles, idioms and visions is as refreshing as a leisurely walk in the woods on an early spring morning. Seventeen writers and their nano worlds; their delight in language as a game and a social medium; their views and insights---all these turn their flash fictions into memorable literary encounters.

We thank Kelli for her kind support to a noble cause and as a fellow practitioner of the craft, her choice is impeccable. Our gratitude to these participants as well.

*

There are other regular features as well.

A great variety of prose and poems written by writers earning recognition across the publishing world. There are critical essays and book reviews that echo current concerns; a photo feature and an interview.

Author of the month is the Canadian poet, writer, editor and founder of a press---  Sharon Berg.

Highlight of the edition is an insightful paper by the celebrated artist, Robert Maddox-Harle, the senior editor of this journal.

Enough to last a month, no longer cruel, in some senses!

Sunil Sharma

Editor, Setu (English)
Kalyan, MMR, India

Guest Editor’s Note: Setu Flash Fiction April, 2019

 My love of short stories developed when I was a child. My father had an amazing and creative
mind. He would create scavenger hunts for my sister and me and when each new clue was
revealed, it added to a story only his beautiful mind could create. When I was bored, rather than
telling me to go outside and play, he would sit down with a pencil and notebook and we would
create a story together. Sometimes it would be about aliens and far away worlds, others would be
about adventures on frozen lakes and in dense woods. I was 9 years old when I began to
appreciate reading and writing even more and wanted to create vivid stories for others to read.
 Today, even all these years later, the quest for writing vivid short stories is ever present. A
short story can tell a complete and engaging tale even with a limited number of words. A well
written short story should enable the reader to envision the events as if they are watching it play
out before their eye. Characters so real, the reader believes they may have once met or can see
themselves in someone else’s shoes. Stories so well orchestrated the reader is transported to
another land and desires to know more.

 I present to you a fantastic collection of Flash Fiction Short Stories from all across the globe.
Tales of wonder and tales of woe. Tales that will always leave you wanting more.

-Kelli J Gavin

Guest Editor: Flash Fiction Special Issue, Setu, April 2019


Hidden Enemy - By: Mark Kuglin
Under the Bridge: A Letter Home - By: Beate Sigriddaughter
Somewhere My Love - By: Steve Carr
Grandpa - By: Silvana McGuire
Last Call For Old Friends - By: John Patrick Robbins
No Illusions - By: Steven Storrie
Coming of Age - By: S.B. Borgersen
Kid Work - By: Paul Beckman
She’s Dead - By: Mark Towse
The Opportunist - By: Carl Papa Palmer
Elmo - By: Ed Scannell
The Last Carton of Milk - By: Vineetha Mokkil
Palace Bunker (A Brief Sketch) - By: Scott Thomas Outlar
Girl In the Shell - By: Francine Witte
Business as Usual - By: Abu Siddik
A Valentine’s Day Noir - By: Louis Kasatkin
The Dweller of a Misty Land- Debjani Mukherjee

Book Review: Aneek Chatterjee’s Seaside Myopia

Review by: Sandipta Kanti Nag

Associate Professor of English and Literary Critic

Seaside Myopia: A Book of Poems
Author: Aneek Chatterjee
Publisher: Cyberwit.net, 2018
ISBN: 978-93-88125-25-3
Price: ₹ 200 INR; $ 15 USD


                           “Seaside Myopia: A Book of Poems” authored by Aneek Chatterjee and published by Cyberwit.net (2018) sails through poems culled from different genres and styles, varying from dark poetry to poems waxing eloquently on love, relationship and sensuality. The poet’s perspective is sui-generis – to connect himself with his landscape as well as his mindscape in particular; or, we may say, to the universe and the cosmos in general. Chatterjee’s poetry highlights his startling ability to amalgamate tradition and modernity to assume a new role of a poet speaking for humanity across the national borders and the amazing plasticity of his diction that incorporates the demands of particular moods. A sensitive reader of his poems, that have emerged from “daily life and societal milieu; poems crafted out of melancholy and joy” (Preface of the Book), cannot fail to discern a poetic subtlety in Chatterjee’s poetry that makes him a poet with a diversity of ideas and inclinations, with a finely tuned aesthetics and great command over language and style. The sole aim of referring to such wide ranging critical evaluation of a poet is to harp on the richness and authenticity embedded in the poems of Chatterjee. One need not, by accident even, misread such evaluative statements as mere eulogy without its solid anchorage in “Seaside Myopia”.

Aneek Chatterjee
                             Poems included in the book eminently bear the stamp of the poet’s originality, both in terms of handling the creative medium with felicity and ease and of perambulating between the landscape and inscape with a view to mould a vision which is earth-bound, land-bound, and yet which can experience an untrammeled, uninhibited magical ecstasy of being amongst ‘waves’, ‘sand’, ‘children’ and ‘seagulls’, as in the title poem of the volume. Aneek Chatterjee’s poetry also evidences a queer and, at times, an intriguing blend of a romantic mind with modern sensibility. In the very opening (dark) poem of this volume, one comes across a queer ‘Reminiscence’ in which the poet harps on the shock of his discovery of the strange ways of the world. This poem effortlessly blends the present life to an earlier life, where a person was shot by someone he trusted. Or is it a reflection of our feeling that we get shot at every day, every moment of our existence? The shock and wound that come from societal horror of the landscape, beyond self, got eerily painted:
                           He will cross tramlines, pubs
                           and a theater, a school
                           He will enter a by-lane
                           I know very well ….

                           and shoot me                          (Reminiscence) 

Sandipta Kanti Nag
                      The poet moves easily from a dark world to the world of love and emotion. He succeeds in showing the gap between the security of the private world sanctioned by love, and the insecurity of the public life, mired with fear and crisis. Chatterjee is at his lyrical best in some of his remarkable love poems, not found frequently now-a-days:
                             Touch me, touch my heart; I look up
                             at your face, and loudly say
                             ‘shut the world and let me love
                             like an insane’, every moment n every day             (Shut the World)

We sail through magical rhymes with the poet in another love poem:

                                  My boat is ready for you
                                  Feel free to sail through

                                  the blue waters, away from shore
                                  Away from mundanity and more

                                  Away from beloved garden and film show
                                  Will you ? I am afraid of hearing a ‘no’          (A New World Beckons)

With love, sensuality takes a considerable shape in Chatterjee’s anthology, and he is equally comfortable in his portrayals:

                                   You’ve uncovered me
                                    and my ecstasy
                                    in this moonlit night 

                                    As you groan loud in joy
                                    Hillocks tell me
                                    they have been conquered in silence

                                    In a surreal moonlight                                      (Surreal Moonlight)

                 
                        If Chatterjee traverses through tradition in hillocks, moonlight, love and sensuality; he also paints with equal ease the ‘cloggy by-lanes’ of the modern world. In one of the efficient Triolets, he depicts nuances of the modern life:

                              I wanted to see light in darkness
                              But unruly mind did not want a vision
                              Carnivals dance floor fuelled me to express
                              I wanted to see light in darkness
                              Urban flights, diamond smile, unworthy to impress
                              Dark by-lanes strewn inside, cloggy passion                   (Dark By-lanes) 

The modern mind is storage of the complexities of the modern world; and the poet is fully aware of such complexities:

                                And mind is a blackhole
                                Sucks sunshine and the cactus
                                white and yellow
                                sucks the sand
                                green blue red and black 
                                …………………………………
                                Mind sucks blackholes
                                Time sand and the cactus
                                watch in silence                                      (Blackholes Sand …) 


                        The presence of sorrow, pain and sufferings, apart from love and sensuality, in different poems of the volume makes “Seaside Myopia” a fascinating read. The inescapable sorrow and pain in all the visible and invisible avenues of life have been aptly portrayed in the volume. Poems like ‘Circle of Melancholy’, ‘Pencil in My Brain’, ‘Dinner Table’, ‘Alien’, ‘The Ivory Tower’ excel in this realm. One is often struck also by similes and imageries in several poems, like in the ‘Rains’:

                                  Rains came
                                  at 11 a.m.
                                  on punctured tyre and broken chain.
                                  On john’s tin roof
                                  with dancing mango pickles                                (Rains)
                             
and in ‘Mud’:

                                   Look, I’m drenched in mud
                                  thrown from all sides and, heaven.
                                  Look, I’m thrilled with mud
                                  of all colors.
                                  Is mud part of the curricula ?                               (Mud)   

                      There are some jarring effects in a few poems that shake and destabilize readers, like ‘my contact with a drenched body’ (p.33); ‘liquid comes out, strange, / human blood’ (p.14); ‘Do I search a mind in the corpse?’ (p.15);  or ‘Torn hair of raped sister’ (p.14). But such jarring effects make the reader face realities of a dark time we are passing through. Overall, “Seaside Myopia” makes a rewarding read. What strikes most is the poet’s immaculate willingness to connect the self with the other, body with soul, person with the landscape and the universe. The volume deserves a place in every poetry lover’s bookshelf and in every library.
                              __________________________________________________ 

The Author: Aneek Chatterjee is an Indian poet and academic from Kolkata and author of “Seaside Myopia: A Book of Poems” (Cyberwit.net, 2018). He has been published in literary magazines in the USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Mauritius, Philippines, Bangladesh and India. His poems have been included in eight anthologies also; -- all published from the USA. Chatterjee has a ph.d. in International Relations. He also authored and edited 9 academic books and a novel titled “The Funeral Procession”, besides numerous articles. He taught at the University of Virginia, USA as a Fulbright Visiting fellow.

The Reviewer: Sandipta Kanti Nag is currently working as Associate Professor of English in Hooghly Mohsin College, one of the prestigious academic institutions in India, established in 1836. His recent  credits are: ‘Poems from Santiniketan', an anthology of poems from Visva-Bharati University;  'Mati o Manush' from Dhaka, Bangladesh; 'Indo-French Festival Volume' from the old French city of Chandernagore; 'The Presidency  College Magazine' from Kolkata; translations in 'Kabita o Samaj' from Kolkata; 'More Poems from Santiniketan'; articles in 'Indo-Anglian Literature: Past to Present', in the ‘175th Anniversary Volume of Hooghly Mohsin College and miscellaneous columns on literature and society in books and journals of repute.

Setu, April 2019 - Contents

Setu

Volume 3 Issue 11

April 2019


Setu PDF Archives

Edit: Special Edition: Flash Fiction

Special Edition: Poetry: Flash Fiction

Poetry: General

Novel (In Serial Form)

Translation

Fiction / Flash Fiction (General)

Author of the Month

Conversations

Contemporary concerns

Highlight

Book review

Art / Photo Feature


Woman and Society: Combatting the Gender stereotyping and dismantling the power Structures

Ruchi Raj Thakur
ABSTRACT
The status of women or gender issues has become a common subject of discussion in social, literary, legal and academic circles. This concept has found a place of significance not only in verbal discourse but also in writings. In fact, Gender inequality has gained a universal recognition but the degree to which the discussion takes place differs. Gender inequality is a concept which etymologically refers to the disparity between the two different sexes which is the result of the social and cultural beliefs and assumptions. This paper aims to voice those social inequalities which are experienced more by women, because they are women. It interrogates those beliefs which are responsible for the miserable condition of woman. This paper portrays John Galsworthy’s and Vijay Tendulkar’s women characters who attempt to smash the obdurate social norms and to live on their terms and conditions. Though they become victims of the patriarchal structure, yet they do not lose hope and continue to fight against the system by dealing with it in their own ways. This paper also highlights the duality of Indian society which does not allow them to denounce these conventionalist styles of living. It investigates the wretched condition of women and their relegation to an insignificant position by the society. It further touches upon themes like alienation, loneliness, oppression, unprecedented violence against women, lack of autonomy, dependence, etc.
Key words: Autonomy, Alienation, Conventionalist styles, Patriarchal, Duality.

“It is not important to not just make art but also ensure it creates an impact”-says Vibha Gandotra
A literary writer studies the ethos, social mores, beliefs, philosophies, social outlook, or opinions, biases of a particular culture or society. So, literature, in other words, is a reflection of the society. Whether the piece of literary art is shaped by a Hindi writer or English or Australian or American literature etc., the writers remain committed to the sole purpose of mirroring reality. An article ‘Art for cause’s sake’ in The Tribune Trends reads that, “Art is no more religious propaganda or for visual pleasure alone. It is increasingly moving into the space of activism”. Writers, irrespective of their origin, enunciate their experiences and observations in their writings. They bring to fore all the practices, virtues and vices of the social milieu to which they belong. They objectively paint the injustices meted out by the marginalised and the silenced in the social edifice. In the same newspaper article Nonika Singh says, “An artist’s voice must be heard too.”
Many writers of the times have depicted the issues of gender discrimination, inequality and violence against the women as themes of their writings. The present paper discusses the endeavours of John Galsworthy and Vijay Tendulkar to have an insight into the social upheavals responsible for the deplorable conditions of women. It further discusses that the conditions of women remain the same irrespective of the times and the periphery to which the literary works belong. This paper mulls upon the condition of women as depicted in John Galsworthy’s Justice and Vijay Tendulkar’s Silence! The court is in session.
John Galsworthy and Tendulkar are crusaders of humanity and compassion which is noticeable in their literary writings. Both the writers try to underscore the deplorable state of women through their thought provoking writings, stridently enunciating the state of contemporary society, its values and norms. Their writings have a social purpose which is to reform the social edifice by purging off evils and worn out traditions from the social establishment. Justice is a portrayal of the unhealthy prison life and the evil of solitary confinement affecting the mental conditions of the prisoners enduring the pain of solitude. It revolves around the pitiable state of the prisoners but in passivity it also speaks about the condition of women in those times.
 Ruth Honey Will is introduced in the play as a victim of societal pressures and social obligations. Ruth’s atrocious marriage compels her to walk out of her failed married life. She decides to shun her relationship because her drunkard husband would often beat her and one day even tries to strangle her to death. Ruth Honey Will’s decision to call off her marriage wins criticism in the society. She becomes the victim of the stereotype social mentality because she dares to transgress the thresholds of autonomy and attempts to break the tyrannical marital bond to rearticulate the meaning of her life. But her attempt to smash the glass ceiling of the age old norms is highly condemned in the social circles.
If the so called social system is wrecked by men, the society remains stoic because such freedom automatically comes to them from their existence.  On the contrary, women ought to acquiesce to the social norms and obligations. If she fails to concede then she has to face the social ferocity. Society plays the role of a sadist who finds pleasure in one’s discomfiture. The unfortunate truth about such situation is that no one comes forward to defend a person. Hence, she becomes a so-called ‘accused’ in the eyes of society. Today’s woman prefers to speak rather than to observe meekly. Yashpal, says C.M.Yohanan, believed that:
In the changing circumstances, to achieve parity with men in society, women have to protest against the current social system. If women do not take such an initiative then they will never gain their individuality and self-respect. (Translation mine 133-134)
The utter mental anguish of Ruth Honey Will becomes clear when she informs Mr. Cokeson of the urgency to meet Falder as she says, “It’s a matter of life and death!”(4). On meeting Falder, she narrates her husband’s uncouth behaviour of beating her insensitively. This meeting informs the readers about the plans of the two lovers to run away to South America so as to start a life afresh. Unfortunately, the day they plan to leave, Mr. James How discovers Falder’s involvement in a fraud of altering a cheque by adding a nought to 9 and ‘ty’ to nine. Falder’s confession reveals his relationship with Ruth Honeywill and the reasons for the commission of the crime which are disdainfully condemned by his colleagues and his employer, Mr. James How. James might have given Falder another chance to prove his loyalty but his involvement with a married woman makes him more rigid in his approach. He considers him promiscuous in his ways. James remarks, “If it had been a straightforward case I’d give him another chance. It’s far from that. He has dissolute habits”(20).
In the court room, Hector Frome tries to convince the court that the misery of Ruth Honey Will stimulated Falder to commit the crime. He says, “…She saw a way out of her misery by going with him to a new country, where they would both be unknown, and might pass as husband and wife. This was a desperate and, as my friend Mr. Cleaver will no doubt call it, an immoral resolution; but, as a fact, the minds of both of them were constantly turned towards it.…  whatever opinion you form of the right of these two young people under such circumstances to take the law into their own hands­-the fact remains that this young woman in her distress, and this young man, little more than a boy, who was so devotedly attached to her, did conceive this…”(28).
Falder also confirms Frome’s statement that Ruth was in a dreadful condition and needed immediate help and so he could not think of the implication of his deed before committing it. He says, “I was having my breakfast when she came. Her dress was all torn, and she was gasping and couldn’t seem to get her breath at all; there were the marks of his fingers round her throat; her arm was bruised, and the blood had got into her wyes dreadfully. It frightened me, and then when she told me, I felt-I felt-well –it was too much for me! [Hardening suddenly] If you’d seen it, having the feelings for her that I had, you’d have felt the same, I know”(41).
The court including the counsel for the crown and the Judge consider Ruth’s reference in the case as nothing but a romantic and an emotional fascination to the case. The counsel for the crown says, “Divested of the romantic glamour which my friend is casting over the case, is this anything but an ordinary forgery?”(43). The Judge too turns down Frome’s plea to show mercy to Falder for the very reason that he committed the crime with an intention to help Ruth. He says, “The story has been told here to-day of your relations with this-er-Mrs. Honeywill; on that story both the defense and the plea for mercy were in effect based. Now what is that story? Is it that you, a young man, and she, a young woman, unhappily married, had formed an attachment, which you both admit was about to result in such relationship. Your counsel has made an attempt to palliate this, on the ground that the woman is in what he describes, I think, as, “a hopeless position.”…She is a married woman, and the fact is patent that you committed this crime with the view of furthering an immoral design….Your counsel has made an attempt to trace your offence back to what he seems to suggest is a defect in the marriage law; he has made an attempt also to show that to punish you with further imprisonment would be unjust….”(58).
Women are expected to compromise at every step and also understand that to make a marriage work comes under her social responsibilities. Ruth’s husband is absolved from the stigma of a bad husband and also his habit of consuming alcohol heavily. John Galsworthy, indirectly, dwells on the condition of women in the then times. The women characters have been discussed mildly but as a reader one feels the mental anguish of women due to the social mores. A hapless victim of male-chauvinism, Ruth Honey Will, is left alone to fend for herself and her children because Falder goes to imprisonment for three years and she breaks her marital strings, she was tied to. The major cause of women’s suffering is their economic dependence. It makes them more vulnerable in the society. Their fragile economic condition curbs their control over themselves completely and compels them to succumb to the social hierarchy. Ruth Honey Will does not accede to such social and cultural pressure and fights against the social structure and values her freedom from the unwanted relationship, a colossal of patriarchy. Jane Freeman remarks:
…The liberation of women thus depends on freeing women from this social construct of the ‘eternal feminine’, which has reduced them to a position of social and economic inferiority… (14)
Kate Millett defines patriarchy as a political discourse in that it involves ‘power-structured relationships, arrangements whereby one group of persons is controlled by another’ (67). Kate also believes that oppression is ingrained in the gender system of patriarchy. As it is embedded in the very foundation of the system so society considers it intrinsic part of women’s life. If some women fail to bear male oppression, they are ostracized by the society. It has no solution to a woman’s problem. Falder’s admission of defeat leaves Ruth weeping and thumping her chest. But the inerrant society does not come to comfort her.
The play also discusses the relationship of a husband and wife as that of an oppressor and oppressed. Falder’s sister is not permitted to meet her brother, Falder, in captivity. She requests Mr. Cokeson to meet her brother. This speaks about those times when women were nettled in the web of tyranny and patriarchy. If a woman gains strength to challenge the social and cultural structures she is trapped in, then she is labeled as a ‘bad woman’. Nighat says, “…Roles are well-defined and a good life means performing those roles…”(130). Patriarchy, conditions the minds of people to such an extent that they refuse to recognise women’s suffering because this is something which is part of the circumstance of their being. As such, silencing and marginalisation of women cannot be judged as something unusual vis-├а-vis the fact of their existence. Vijay Tendulkar too challenges social malpractices which deter the prosperity of women’s lives. Being tied to traditions, their predicament shapes their destiny. The play is a mouthpiece of feminism because does not speak about the supremacy of one gender over another. It simply speaks about the human like treatment to be given to woman if man enjoys it. It seriously mulls on the question of social duality as it weighs both the sexes differently. The play emphasizes the role of society in fanning such practices which widens the cavity between the two.
Silence! The court is in Session depicts the struggle of an unwed woman who gets pregnant against the society. Mr. Kashikar, Mrs. Kashikar, Bhole Rokde, Sukhatma, Karnik, Ponkshe and Samant play the role of society. They pounce on Leela and assassinate her character. Leela Benare, in Silence! The court is in Session, emerges as partially a ‘new woman’ because she tries to live in the world of her desires to choose her own ways and prefers no change in the self but the other side of her personality stops her because she fears the adversities.
An autonomous woman is the biggest social irregularity because she can articulate herself fearlessly. The fearlessness of woman is alarming for a man, who is an intrinsic part of the hegemonic power structure. Leela is introduced as a fun- loving character. Leela Benare’s character has different hues. She is lively and frank. Her frankness offends her co-actors. She makes her appearance in the first scene with Samant, a local resident. Leela seems to be an assertive, successful and economically independent woman. But as the conversation progresses, it seems Leela tries to confide in Samant a dark truth of her life. She says, “…Just because of one bit of slander, what can they do to me? Throw me out? Let them! I haven’t hurt anyone. Anyone at all! If I’ve hurt anybody, it’s been myself…Who are these people to say what I can or can’t do? My life is my own- I haven’t sold it to anyone for a job! My will is my own. My wishes are my own. No one can kill those - no one! I’lldo what I like with myself and my life! I’ll decide…”(7).
Initially the truth remains a mystery for the readers because Samant shows his disinterestedness in her life. Samant tries to digress from the issue and says, “Shall I go and see why the others haven’t arrived yet?” (7). This shows that either Samant was too pretentious in his behaviour or absolutely na├пve. Because he even fails to notice Leela’s hand that unconsciously rests­ on her stomach.
Leela is self-sufficient but somewhat feeble. She tells him not to leave her alone because “ I feel scared when I am alone, you know”(7). She is a member of an acting team of theatre actors who perform on social themes in order to bring reformation in the social set up and the mentality of the people. This further speaks about the duality and hypocrisy of the society which practices exactly contrary to what it preaches. Silence! The court is in Session is a play within a play. One play is didactic while the other blurs the line between the real and the make believe world. The former revolves around Benare and reveals the real face of the society. To bid time, the actors decide to act a mock trial. They decide to choose Benare as an accused of infanticide. She objects repeatedly but her pleas go unheard. It seems that the co-actors were head bound to carry the trial on the mentioned charge because such charges are more enticing. Kashikar says, “…The question of infanticide is one of great social significance. That’s why I deliberately picked it. We consider society’s best interests in all we do…” (36).
The trial scene begins but Bhalu’s witness which dwindles the line between the real and the imaginary. His testimony makes the personal life of Leela public. Her relationship with Prof. Damle is exposed. Rokde, who was offended with Benare, looks at Benare triumphantly and says, “ Now laugh! Make fun of me! This lady was there. Damle and this –Miss Benare!” (54). Benare warns them not to drag her personal life into the play. But the other actors do not wish to end it as the play was becoming more captivating. Samant’s witness brings a turning point in the case because he mixes the action of the pornographic novel, he was reading sometime before, with the play of which Benare was the protagonist. He narrates the imaginary conversation between Prof. Damle and Benare and tells the court that he overheard Benare saying, “If you abandon me in this condition, where shall I go?” and Prof. Damle (imaginary) replies, “Where you should go is entirely your problem. I feel great sympathy for you. But I can do nothing. I must protect my reputation” (64).
Indian culture is known for its chivalrous foundation. But it is offensive to see that on the same soil, woman is either oppressed or left abandoned to face the cruel world on the pretext of taking one step against the super imposed boundaries of society. The moment she is spotted by the society, she is dogged by denigration and dishonor.
Leela’s wretchedness continues. She is tormented to see the brazen talking of her co-actors, particularly Ponkshe and Karnik. Ponkshe shamelessly tells the court that she had tried to persuade him to marry her, which he had out rightly denied. Karnik too testifies her as a lady with easy virtue by telling the court about her childhood affair with her maternal uncle and her failed attempt to end her life. An article ‘A Bulwark for Unwed Mothers’ in The Hindu reads:
The plight of many unwed mothers in India who
 became second class citizens simply because they
had sex without marriage, with or without their
consent and were loving and responsible enough
 not to abandon their children. They ended up
economically and socially marginalised.
Leela patiently embroils in a long-drawn court battle. But to see her personal life at stake, she ultimately breaks down and confesses in a soliloquy that she was seduced by her uncle when her youth was blooming. He made her realise about her womanhood, which brought her closer to him. But the coward man took advantage of her innocence and deserted her when she needed him the most. She was punished by her mother, while her uncle got away with his sin, unpunished. She sings an English song,
Oh, I’ve got a sweatheart
Who carries all my books,
                                      He plays in my dollhouse.
And says he likes my looks,
I’ll tell you a secret-
He wants to marry me,
But mummy says, I’m too little
To have such thoughts as these. (7)
Benare was too innocent to understand that her uncle tramples on her doll house and her mummy will never be able to see that with her coerced blindness. She says that when she fell in love for the second time with Prof. Damle, whom she considered a God of knowledge, she thought that she has found her true love. But he too devoided her of her chastity in the name of love. She confesses that Damle was another vulture who was attracted to her flesh and body. Nighat Gandhi, “Is that love? Pyaar ka matlab hai matlab ka pyaar. The meaning of love is selfishness”(248). She also fearlessly accepts that motherhood took her to Ponkshe so that her child outside marriage could get a legal identity.
It is disappointing to see that our society does not allow a woman to convey herself freely Subservience is appreciated as the prime characteristic of ‘good woman’ while assertion of freedom shows pervicaciousness in her. Society tries to snap her confidence and convince her that woman’s submissiveness is men’s command.
Some women are also encouraging patriarchy because they readily accept the age-old social norms. They cannot think of breaking the glass ceiling of sore social ties. They prefer being subdued and silent because they cannot offend the society by demanding liberty. Mrs. Kashikar is incapable of challenging the rigid patriarchy. Hence, drags the unnecessary burden of social norms and sore relationships. She is controlled by her husband but she mutely accepts it. In a patriarchal set-up, an ideal woman is one who would always need a man for security in her life; one who would always need a male protection and cannot take a step further without a man’s consent. It seems the women who cannot resist the rigidity of the society take vengeance on other women, who do not yield to the system. Mrs. Kashikar expects Benare to bow down to the set-pattern of society and not to dismantle the traditionally approved model of the Indian women. Simon de Beauvoir holds that the patriarchal conditioning of the society makes the concept of sex and gender convoluted. Society considers sex and gender synonymous, which is an incorrect notion. Sex is a biological aspect while gender is a social theory. Simon de Beauvoir once said, “One is not born, but rather becomes a woman” (496).
Mrs. Kashikar spews poison against the women who do not get married at the so-called tender age. She utters, “…That’s what happens these days when you get everything without marrying. They just want comfort. They couldn’t care less about responsibility! Let me tell you- in my time, even if a girl was snub-nosed, sallow, hunchbacked, or anything whatever, she could still get married! It’s the sly fashion of women earning that makes everything go wrong. That’s how promiscuity has spread throughout our society” (76).
It is not only woman against woman but also patriarchy against woman. Except Samant and Shanta Gokhle. All other men present consider Benare coquettish and pounces on her as a preyer pounces on its prey. This is not the end but beginning of her predicaments. An economically independent woman is deprived off her school job. She is removed from the school because of an apprehension that she would defile the environment of the school and influence the school kids who might go astray under her influence. Nanasaheb Shinde of Bombay, a famous leader, too refutes the idea of an unwed mother. He says, “It is a sin to be pregnant before marriage. It would be still more immoral to let such a woman teach in such condition! There is no alternative – this woman must be dismissed’ (97). Benare is economically better placed than the rest of her theatre comrades. Her economic sufficiency was enough to give encounter the very existence of patriarchy.
Sukhatme rests his case as a prosecutor says, “…Her conduct has blackened all social and moral values. The accused is public enemy number one. If such socially destructive tendencies are encouraged to flourish, this country and its culture will be totally destroyed. Therefore, I say the court must take a very stern, inexorable view of the prisoner’s crime, without being trapped in any sentiment. The charge against the accused is one of infanticide. But the accused has committed a far more serious crime. I mean unmarried motherhood. Motherhood without marriage has always been considered a very great sin by our religion and our traditions. Moreover, if the accused’s intention of bringing up the offspring of this unlawful maternity is carried to completion, I have a dreadful fear that the very existence of society will be in danger….A woman bears the grave responsibility of building up the high values of society. Na stri swatantryamarhati. ‘Woman is not fit for independence.’…’Miss Benare is not fit for independence’ (101).
Prof. Damle is a married man with five children but the responsibility of the well-being of nation lies merely on woman. Not even once it is mentioned in the play that Prof. Damle is at fault. Leela Benare, who is advanced and to some extent emancipated, breaks away from the traditional role of a wed mother unconsciously because she is deceived by Prof. Damle. Prof. will undoubtedly be supported by the society but such women are never accepted by society. Kashikar, Judge of the mock trial, shows his utter biasness when he says, “The crime you have committed are most terrible. There is no forgiveness for them. Your sin must be expiated. Irresponsibility must be chained down. Social customs, after all, are of supreme importance. Marriage is the very foundation of our society stability…Criminals and sinners should know their place…Moreover, the future of posterity was entrusted to you. This is a very dreadful thing. The morality, which you have shown through your conduct, was the morality you were planning to impart to the youth of tomorrow. This court has not an iota of doubt about it. Hence, not only today’s, but tomorrow’s society would have been endangered by your misconduct. It must said that the school officials have done a work of merit in deciding to remove you from your job…No memento of your sin should remain for future generations. Therefore this court hereby sentences that you shall live. But the child in your womb shall be destroyed” (108).
Benare sobs and then become silent, but her silence yells her protest. She had only one true relation of a mother and her baby, besides fake and unnatural relationships. She remains tongue tied because of her contrived and coerced docility to get absorbed into the ‘tradition-encrusted chadar of her culture’ to borrow Nighat’s phrase.
It deliberates upon the dualism of the society and also shows its concern for those the established norms of social behavior are only for women and not men. No restriction is imposed on men. Are the norms only for woman and the penalty of spurning the limitation is also to be borne only by her? Or freedom is only men’s undeniable right, while women have to constantly live in the ‘unable to act’ in “atmosphere of discrimination and suppression” to borrow Ahmed Salim’s phrase. Social change is certainly the credo of these writings. The most painful thing to observe is that in Indian society the male is never considered wrong, his actions seem justified and the blame of everything falls on the woman. While pointing to the essential differences of attitudes, priorities and cultural conditioning of men and women, RajiSeth says that, “Man is accepted, a woman fights to be accepted”(qtd. by Chandra Nisha37). And women chose to fight the biases.


Works Cited
Primary Sources
Tendulkar, Vijay.  Silence! The Court is in session. Translated by Priya Adakar. New Delhi: OUP, 2017.
.
Galsworthy, John. Justice.New York: The New Public Library:1910.

Secondary Sources
Antahpur, Agrahayan, 1962. Print.
Freeman, Jane. Feminism: Concepts in the Social Sciences. Philadelpheia: OUP, 2001. Print.
Gandhi, Nighat M. Alternative Realities. New Delhi: Thomson Press Limited, 2012. Print.
Pandya, Rameshwari. Women in India Issues, Perspectives and Solutions. New Delhi: New Century Publications, 2007. Print.

Plato, Republic. ed. F.M.Cornford. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1941.Print.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Emile, trans. Barbara Foxley London, Melbourne and Toronto: Everyman, 1911. Print.
 _________. The Social Contract and Discourses, trans. G.D.H. Cole London: Everyman, 1913. Print
Saswati Sengupta, Shampa Roy, Sharmila Purkayastha. Towards Freedom Critical Essays On Rabindranath Tagore’s Ghare Baire/ The Home And The World. Orient Longman Private Limited, 2007. Print.
Singh, Chandra Nisha. Radical Feminism and Women’s Writings. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, 2007. Print.
Sharma, Aradhika, “Woman, thy name is grit”. The Sunday Tribune Spectrum. March 3, 2019.
Nonika, Singh, “Art for Cause’s Sake”. The Tribune Trends. March 30, 2019.

Priyadarshni and Micnhimer’s Lines Across Oceans: Lyrics on Multifariousness of Love in an Era of Lovelessness.

- Chaitali Giri

Guest Lecturer at MUC Women’s College


Abstract:
Veterans have always reckoned that love has no language, no age. Being in love one can connect through unsaid words, through unpainted eyes, through unmediated smiles, and through untamed emotion. The world has experienced love and its purity so far by excavating its all sides, untying every knot. The present world of technology and easy availability of desired objects has caused a deficiency in the sincerity of love. Nalini Priyadarshini, the poet of the beautiful anthology of love lyrics Doppelganger in My House, has penned another collection of love poems entitled Lines across Oceans in collaboration with D. Russel Micnhimer and this anthology has what lovers will proclaim a recurring venture of that pure bond. The book is more like an antidote to the new illness of lovelessness and like an opportunity to relive that era of all conquering love through the poets’ written emotions. This article will focus on that multifariousness of love which is vibrantly present in the anthology and which has so far been conferred with all soothing and all healing powers:
If life is tangled, soul is wounded, or the landmarks of one’s own development and future are lost, love can be used as a magical mirror through which the circumstances appear in a better way.’(Maatta and Uusiautti 8)
Keywords: Love, Truthfulness, Timelessness, Lovelessness, Purity
‘Let me not to the marriage of true minds/ Admit impediments. Love is not love/ Which alters when it alteration finds,’ (Shakespeare 90, 116). Those who love are also in love with this commandment of Shakespeare. True love, which to Shakespeare was an unbreakable bond, inseparable union of two true minds; which to Donne was the only means to reach God, has multifarious upshots. Lines Across Oceans is a celebrated demonstration of that love which knows no obstacle. The most important facet of such love is that it is not confined within places and countries and thereby not limited to reasons:
“…there are no reason for loving – love is a “basic” or “unmotivated” desire. …feelings and attractions are not the sort of phenomena that admit of justification… are the sort of things that can make sense or fail to make sense. (Martin 698)
 It is never necessary to fall for someone who belongs only to one’s own country, comes only of one’s own culture, proficient only in one’s own language. The reason or the bases should be love and nothing but love itself:
If thou must love me, let it be for nought
Except for love’s sake only. (Browning 321, XIV)
 A long distance relationship between someone from India and someone from the other side of the oceans can also happen and can be cherished too. In her poem Just Before Dawn: Katuata, Priyadarshini evinced:
Distance just measures
How far and swift love travels(7-8, Lines Across Oceans 15)
It is always the person we fall in love with and never with their values and culture:
We do not really fall in love with values. Otherwise we would love all those who share those values and privilege certain aspirations, but these do not always coincide.( Enns 51)
Distance is only a measure and it works sometimes as a catalyst to kindle the desire to be together again. Though the separation is only physical and never emotional, an insecurity borne out of the absence:
When falling in love, also fears and insecurity start gnawing. Therefore not only many previously experienced feelings of happiness from childhood revive but also confusion and fears…( Maatta and Uusiautti 10)
 To those who love and suffer a situational separation, nature appoints itself as a bearer – sometimes of the vacantness, sometimes of the remembrances caused by love tokens, sometimes of the good wishes that keep the fortune of the lover working. In her poem Mango Sun the lover dreams of an Indian summer visualizing a little girl savouring the sweetness of a ripe mango. The vision made him remember the sweetness of the beloved. His words, in turn, sweeten and soothe her ears, leaving their resounding and echoing effects there:
Dreaming today
Of Indian summer
I saw you,…
I taste the sweetness of Alphonso today
On my lips
Parched longing
For ears that hear
Unspoken uncertainty
In all my conversations
Smooth over warring factions
Of my being
With your presence. (1-3, 21-29 LAO 31 )
The token can be an affectionate gesture like a passionate kiss which had once enlivened the parched lips or it can be some gifts, too, like a rudraksh mala. Wearing the beaded garland and sensing the poking touch of the beads which had once touched her body, the lover can reimagine the sensation of being in her arms:
She wore them for a while
Before she sent them to me
From across my western sea
Rudraksh beads to remind you
Of my arms around your neck
Though you are far away( Rudraksh Beads from India 1-7, LAO 38)
Recapitulating the kissed lips, s/he longs ‘To rejuicinate them nectar’ (9) again whom time and its drought have left dried, devoid of moisture, keeping away ‘the monsoon’ (revival) of their lips. The burning passion of kiss and longing is well expressed in Thirst which emanates a quenched sensation:
Sweat of your longing
I grow in beads
On your upper lips
Cradling a thirst
To trickle down
The sun you hold
Between your lips
And sizzle before I go. (10-17, LAO 11)
Leaving each other’s imprints on each other to cast an ever invigorating effect of their unconditional love is like the elixir, like the touchstone that only magically renews and strengthened the bond:
When falling in love, even the negative features are seen as a positive light or explained in and again. (Maatta and Uusiautti 10)
It is this love fantasy that helps to cut down and calm down the desire of touch. The poets have enriched their lyrics with unparalleled and vibrant imageries. Waiting long for the loved one cause so many emotional traits working together that even some of the everyday habits can also renovate the desire for a reunion. The splashing sound of a favourite drink can make you yearn for the sizzling sound of the loved one’s voice. As the sound of the drink drawing towards the edge of the cup and thereby slipping into the lips quench the thirst, lovers, too, pine for the sweetness of the spoken words of the beloveds to make their thirsty ears quenched:
I hope soon the empty
Pitcher will be full and I will
Drink deeply again; (Listening Cups 34-36, LAO 52)
Even if they cannot satiate their desire physically, a recapitulation saves them from desperateness and depression but no alteration ever eludes their love smitten hearts. Truly thus has Barrett Browning expressed:
Go from me. Yet I feel that I shall stand
Henceforward in thy shadow. Nevermore
Alone upon the threshold of my door
Of individual life, I shall command
The uses of my soul, nor lift my hand
Serenely in the sunshine as before
Without the sense of that which I forbore, ..
Thy touch upon the palm. (Browning 319, VI)
This extremely emotional sentiment has a psychological fortification, too:
There is survival in the sense of living-on at the end of love, for physical separation, even though death, may not mean the absence of the beloved. We may conjure up the details of the loved one’s body – from scars to hand gestures to the sound of a voice – and remain sensuously attuned to the absent body, the smell of skin, the taste of lips. In this way the lost love continues to inhabit us, not only in our memories of the world we made together, but in the sense that we will never return to who we were before we loved the person now lost to us. (Enns 54 )
A dolorous separation is destined to be followed by a jocund unification, togetherness. The long waiting, the dried vacantness all get vanished as soon as a passionate embrace brings the two alienated corns in the field of love again:
A forlorn drop
I turn into love
The moment
We emberace
Cease all seeking
Home at last. (Mud Crown 11-16, LAO 14)
This passionate desire to meet him/her keeps the lovers going. The meeting, the unification becomes ‘the elixir of existence’ for the days before they meet again. A part of the lover and the beloved, both, are always with each other for an imaginary ride together at any desirous moment:
I drop a piece of me
Every time our fingertips brush…
Follow you everywhere
Like a flock of yellow butterflies…
Erase all darkness
From musty corners
As reflections meet
To merge and become
Elixir of existence. (Elixir of Existence 1-2 5-6 12-16, LAO 54)
Along with the desire to stay together, the lovers nurture another urge through out their whole existence – the desire to make the existence of their love and loved ones immortal. All the rationality fails to allure them to realize the truth of conferred mortality on every earthly object. But the will, unbound and indomitable, every time finds a way. While it seems impossible to make your love and loved one exist forever, poetry comes in the rescue there:
Love never lacked for those who try to tame it for “higher” purposes or those who would ague that “ the worst evils have been committed in the name of love”. At the same time, love has always had its passionate defenders, though those have more often tended to be poets – the Ovids, Shakesoeares and Donnes – than critics of poetry. (Bryson and Movsesian 1).
 For ages the poets have commemorated their love through the lines of their verses. Expressing love and feelings by sharing written verse for each other helps forming a bond richer and stronger than those sprang from sharing beds:
Our syllables reach out and interwine
Whorled ridges of our separate knowings
Riping through the edges of our touching…
Harmonic echoes that win the game
Of eternity on the table of extinction. (Stronger than Bonds of Flesh 1-3 7-8, LAO 59)
Unlike others they who ‘ […]stretch / Into forever/ Warm showers of earnest love’ (Colours of Rainbow: A Choka 2-4, LAO 49) and who wish to ‘ Dye bodies we inhabit/ In rainbow colors’ (Colours of Rainbow: A Choka 6-7, LAO 49) will never choose to turn into dust at the hands of Time and never remembered again. They are resolute not to:
Let no winds lay asunder
Nor rains wash us away
Twirling whirling
We dance in sunlight
Free from confines of
Bodies and minds (Just Us Dust 10-15, LAO 21)
They, the lovers, strive to write poetry on each other because they think:
When you write poems for me
And I string my words together
To write about you and us
We do more than make love
To each other with our words
We bestow each other with
A slice of eternity. (Slice of Eternity 1-7, LAO 58)
But they are unaware of the fact that their love is already immortal as those who share a divinely pure bond are beyond the calculation of ages:
my flesh knows your soul
from another life. (Blossoms of Wondrous Heart: A mondoka 60-61, LAO 17)
Hence, poetry is never the only means to make love and the lovers immortal to the world when their true love is already timeless. Their love has no age, no count of time just as what Barrett Browning says, ‘…if God choose,/ I shall but love thee better after death.’ (Browning 327, XLIII). Moreover, apart from making poerty a means to make their love live forever, it has a very genuine materialistic purpose too.  Going through the verses written by the lover is like unfolding the heart and thereby paving a path into it:
She shares precious morsels of her life
with him in her verse…
…for him marvels of life
Unfolding like lotus petals…(Arms of Her Heart 1-2 5-6, LAO 46t)
Such is the equation of love, lovers and lyrics.
Besides experiencing the purity of this ideal love, the world has experienced a struggle between what is popularly known as Platonic love and the sensual love of flesh. What is worth to be accepted that one cannot live by a platonic love only:
It is not merely sex – some critics have been eager to dismiss it in just this way. Neither, however, is it only spiritual, intellectual, emotional, or what is popularly referred to as Platonic. The love ... that so much of our poetry celebrates, is a combination of the physical and the emotional, the sexual and the intellectual, the embodied and the ethereal. Above all, it is a matter of mutual choise between lovers who are each at once Lover and beloved. (Bryson and Movsesian 2)
Sensuality is like the touchstone that completes the love. But there is difference between sensuality and sexuality. If the partner’s concern is all about counting the curves of the body of the beloved and not to explore the curves of the heart, then the emotional bond pains more than the physical union. The pain of being used and exploited under the veil of love is what has found expression in Beyond Redemption:
This far and then no more
You can’t come any closer
I cannot let you see my soul…
When its no more than a game
An engagement to keep you busy
Until your next job
Or a more compliant warm body
Finds way under your sheets (Beyond Redemption 1-10 LAO 1)
When love searches for alterations, it should be damned in forlorn or else the ashes of infidelity will ‘get in our eyes’ (Beyond Redemption 30, LAO 1). If it cannot teach you to forget the count of time together, then such love is nothing but wastage of time:
If it does not ruin us beyond redemption
It is just a waste of time. (Beyond Redemption 50-51, LAO  1)
On the contrary radiating the emotion that rouses sensual touches of the lover, even from simple love tokens, is what makes the bond stronger and desirable to both:
… the rough
Balls of the rudraksh beads
Around my neck
You sent me and I have
Never taken off.
I feel smoothness of your skin
I know has touches these
Very orbs… (Dreams From Rudraksh Beads 2-9, LAO  7)
The integrity of the desires to caress each other, to love each other makes the coupling and its ecstasy more intense as if the lovers become one single entity like stars part of a single constellation. The way the passion burns body as though hot caramel has been smeared over the body:
Hot caramel of my skin
Spread slowly over
Golden vanilla of yours…
We melt into marble swirl…
Sweeping our hearts
Into a single constellation
In forever’s sky.(Marble Swirl 1-3 8-10, LAO  11)
Picturing an amour through flavor i.e. depicting a love relationship through food imageries is something one can always instantiate in Priyadarshni. If in Doppelganger in My House she has compared making love with that of kneading bread after having adjusted every relevant and necessary component proportionately: ‘Whorls of my fingers explore your grains/ As I mix oil of first pressing with eggs and milk/ Knead the sweet and salty moments together/ To bridge the gaps between knowing of our hearts (Bread of Oblation6-9 48), in Lines Across Oceans she has brought the imagery of an oddly combined food dish like ‘a jigger of whisky and a jigger of vodka /together in mango juice’ (Tastes Almost Like Love  1-2, LAO 33 ) liked by only a few who will find strong predilection in it. A relationship between two completely different personalities appears apparently ‘horrible’(Tastes Almost Like Love  1-2, LAO 33 ) to the world but is not fully irrelevant because ‘The difficulty in love is that it requires two people to become one still remain two individuals.’ (Maatta and Uusiautti 14). This oddly matched pair can reach their existence to a stage where no expectation of perfection finds existence:
a couple find themselves extremely different from each other;…If a couple gets through this phase, they will move on to the third one where the expectations to each other become more realistic…In Goldstine et al.’s theory, love turns from romantic, passionate love into realistic, “companionable” (Walster & Walster 1978), “mature”, or “right kind of” love (Hatfield, 1988), if the partners manage to overcome the period of unwelcomed emotions.’ (Maatta and Uusiautti 5)
‘One reason I talk about you/ is your name …’ (Your Name 1-2, LAO  41) (ellipsis in original) The most bemusing fascination and obsession of being in love is the charm of articulating the name that let lovers’ hearts race hundreds of marathons at in a moment. The verbal pleasure is, thus, another gratification of being in love. It has a romantic resonance which is different from those of physical and emotional pleasure. The tongue is a small part of our body abut can perform real miracles. When it comes to the point of getting pleasures, tongue plays a vital role. The taste buds carry the pleasure of tasting something which only the tongue can feel. But the pleasure it produces by rolling words of love and care through it, only a love-leaden heart can relate. Not precious gifts or promises but only a few words of kindness can bring solace to a distressed person. The lover, hence, wonders how s/he can make their words ‘taste as good as ice cream on a hot day’ (How Can I Make My Words 1, LAO 5 ) or ‘feel as good as silken’ or make them ‘sound like music’ to the ears of each other. All s/he wants to do is to make a love-leaden offering to the lover through sweet words so that s/he can show ‘the inside’ and can make the other feel his/her real worth ‘not only to the world’ but to his/her own self. Here she establishes an affinity with Elizabeth Barrett Browning who boldly proclaims:
And wilt thou have me fashion into speech
The love I bear thee, finding words enough,…
In words of love hid in me out of reach.
Nay, let the silence of my womanhood
Commend my woman-love to thy belief, -
Seeing that I stand unwon, however wooed,( Browning 320, XIII)
Verbal pleasure not only an emotional appetite. It satiates the physical hunger too, the hunger for warm touches of caress on days of argument:
Hot tip of your tongue
Like the tip of a dagger
Pierces my dreams
Bringing my sword from
Its scabbard
To sharpen it
On the edge
Of your breath ( Defining Destiny 8-15, LAO 4)
The pleasure in the articulated phrases of love and in the pronounced name of the loved person is such that no matter how many beautiful words life teaches you, how many names society offers you to enrich your dictionary of intellect, the name of him/her in the ‘vocabulary would stay new,/ Never would it grow stale or nebulous’ (Quatracrostically Speaking 6-7, LAO 57). In the poem Your Name the poet has beautifully compared the name of the loved person with that of an edible object that leaves immense and lingering pleasure inside the mouth. Like a chocolate ‘it tickles’ (Your Name 3, LAO  41 the lips, like ‘lipstick after a stolen kiss’(Your Name 5, LAO  41) its flavor gets smeared around the mouth; like a strong smell it leaves its reminiscence on his or her ‘auro, igniting/ The interplay of orange and indigo’(Your Name 13-14, LAO  41). Before it finally melts inside the mouth, s/he ‘savors the flavours it bursts into’(Your Name 9, LAO  41) and finally, just like the taste of our favourite chocolate, gets so replete into our tongues that others do not allude our buds, the ‘aftertaste’(Your Name 15, LAO  41) of pronouncing his or her name is so unique that this feeling is ‘the reason of my refusal/ to speak about anybody else’ (Your Name 16-17, LAO  41).
Lovers finding presence of love in everything they visualize or experience around is a very common trait. Poets and writers have thus presented love variedly through different images and imageries to exhibit its multifariousness to the world.  Priyadarshni is a poet to always use such rich imageries to convey her thoughts and the readers have already experienced that richness in her anthology Doppelganger in My House which contains some very common yet very striking images. The imagery of baking or cooking adjusting every necessary ingredient to produce a perfectly tasted dish is presented to convey her message to the readers that writing poetry, too, like baking a cake where all the ingredient are to be mixed in adequate quantity to get the pleasure of a perfectly swollen cake or perfectly tasted cookies though not perfectly shaped:
I, being more concerned with texture
Of ingredients I mix and slap into place
And the flavor they lend to my poems
Can’t be bothered with shapes just now. …
But I want you to relish my poems
As they dissolve in your mouth
Excite your palate, making you ask for more
For poetry is mostly about flavor not shape (Poetry Cookies 9-12, 19-22)
Again the image of a lotus, blooming in mud sometimes gets place at the feet of the god, represents the truth of the superiority of deeds and conducts and not of country, culture or class:
To lie all your life in
Suffocating darkness
Or to rise above it,
Is a choice…always …
It’s not the place you start
But where you reach
And what you become
Padma in the hands of Vishnu (Padma 9-12, 17-20)
In Lines Across Oceans the cooking imagery is again found very appropriately executed. The beloved wants to be kneaded like flour by the fingers of the lover. She has prepared the oven with the lover’s smile and her own genuine efforts to fill every gap to bake the rotis faultlessly:
Place me in that oven I built so
Warmth of burning branches fit
Tight …
Open oven doors to slide the roti out
To baste again rounded peaks with…
The head of your essential
Knighting fingertips
Caressing apart the whole… (Jaan Bread 16-27, LAO 27 )
Image of a rainbow filled with colours of desires and dreams, has found way to her poem Feathers For Me :A Rispetto where the lover gets a dream of the beloved collecting white feathers of peacock for him. The white feathers representing the pure, unmediated mind and heart of the beloved which is to be hued with strong colours of love:
I became a rainbow, a million crystals all colours of one a part.
For it was the pure white feathersthat you gathered as you slept
All colors blended in single treasure trove where all beauty’s kept;
I welcomed them all, they fanned my ardor to love of country wide (Feathers For Me :A Rispetto 4-7, LAO 32)
As mentioned earlier, the use of food and cooking image is what makes her anthology more reverberant. In the poem I Want to Make You Waffles for Breakfast the lover desires to make the belovedsome waffles in the morning, whose every row will be decorated with honey, jelly, juices representing sweet words, polite talking and truthfulness that his ‘heart oozes when your song squeezes’(15, LAO 36)  and reaches ‘the taste buds’(21, LAO 36) of her ears ‘mixed with sugars of fresh fruits/ jellied with essence of my truths’(19-20, LAO 36). There is no space for bitter lies between them. The beloved, on the other hand, likes to hold ‘a special place for everything’(5-6, LAO 36) even for her lover which allowed them both enough space in life and in their relationship as well. This genuine gesture on the part of the beloved has opened a way for the lover to spread butter every time he produces something for her – be it a verbal presentation or the presentation of a cooked dish – to smoothen up the ‘understanding of each other’s words’(12, LAO 36). By gridding the relationship every new day ‘with new flavors/ of jam and insights jelled in perfect pectins’(23-24, LAO 36), they will be able to ‘seal’(29, LAO 36) a hot embrace between them disallowing everything sour and rotten for their days to come.
Love in Priyadarshni has one prominence which cannot be demeaned by the material and mortal world around. It is the purity, the unflinching vitality, its magical presence and its all soothing power. A pure love has that charisma which can charm the world without any formal grandeur. When a lover expresses his true heart to the woman of his dream appealing her to come close so that he can ‘ breathe life into’ (Come Closer if You Wish 8, LAO 3) her cheeks and prompt her ‘…eyes/ to open wide and for the first/ time behold the smile/ of desire without greed’( Come Closer if You Wish 9-12, LAO 3), is when the union gets ‘power stronger than the sea’ (Come Closer if You Wish 18, LAO 3) and out of that pure porcelain of union ‘you and me’ (Come Closer if You Wish 20, LAO 3) get formed with all new personality. The poem Moon Pie beautifully has used a fairytale like ambience to bring out the exuberant desire on the part of a partner to offer an ever shining smile or laughter on the lips of the other so that s/he can ‘come back for it later and / watch you sleep’ (5-6, LAO 8) and thereafter can melt own self around him/her:
When we love a person, we (pragmatically) find both her proximity and her flourishing pleasurable, her absence and suffering painful. Because of these feelings, we become attracted to having her near and to contributing to her flourishing…’(Martin 692-693).
‘Along with falling in love, an individual’s image of himself or herself becomes stronger in many ways. One feels more skilled and capable than before… When the partners try to reveal and specify the features in themselves, falling in love may also improve self knowledge. When being endured, cared and appreciated, the young become ensured that they are good and worth loving’. (Maatta and Uusiautti 11) - the statement has its alibi, the poem If You Do Not Doubt Me, Do Not Doubt Your Beauty. The lovers always are endowed with a special vision, a special glance that excruciate those beauty spots in the beloved that others, even if they hire ‘microscopes and telescopes’(18, LAO 23) ‘to see deep into your eyes/ they would not discovers blinks your gaze flickers into mine.’(18-19, LAO 23) cannot identify whereas the lover will never fail to ‘discover/ some new nuance of your beauty’(12-13, LAO 23). It is the lover and the beloved who have probed in depth their gazes to reach the perfect beauty already present in each other that  does not required to be beautified artificially. The lover thinks the beloved’s structure, her curves, to be beyond the perfection of a veteran sculptor specially when she ‘press/ against me when our limbs seek a perfect common trunk’(25-26, LAO 23). Not only this but what the lover concludes her uniqueness finally is that though he discovers unseen nuances everyday in her face, still ‘there are parts of you words will never be able to describe’ (55, LAO 24) and because she has exhibited ‘ all true beauty comes from inside out’(58, LAO 24).
Love can induce the inhabitants with all altering, all accepting and all adjusting powers there where people fail to find consent. That we should not count what our partners are not sacrificing for the relation, rather we should value their sacrileges to what they pay their devotion to is what has found meaning in this averment:
Morning rituals of shared coffee
With a tea person should make you wary…
Mightn’t be the coffee they are after
But coffee flavored kisses. (Morning Rituals 1-2 9-10, LAO 35  )
The lovers in love share a good understanding with and for each other. The first and foremost aspect is to let each other be their own true being as this can alter each other to goodness, alter as  humans without altering the person:
Fill me with colors of your knowing…
Heal me with whisperings of your soul…
Teach me things…
Sing to me songs only a lover can sing…
Fill my cracks with gold…
Replenish me, renew me
You altered me in a thousand ways
By just being you.(Being you 6 8 10 11 12 13-15, LAO 47)
The poet has drawn her focus into a very important gesture of love which is to let one’s love find expression to reach the hearts to flex it to each other. There is no such day to be called the love’s day; rather each and every day of the lovers is the day of love and showing it to whom the feelings are for is not supposed to be stored for a particular day to come, hence:
Each night I will shower
Your heart with love drops
as numerous as stars in sky. ( To My Valentine 1-3, LAO  55)
Thus, the more you express, the more you ensures places for each other in each other’s hearts. This small gesture of making them undergo the infiniteness of your emotions for them and making them aware of their esteem in their partners’ life, though not showing it off, is what we can call loving.
Conclusion:
‘ Whether love is directed in a life companion, children, fellow humans or various forms of work and doing…it is crucial that people preserve sufficiently powerful passions and dreams, may be even illusions that inspire and make then feel alive. Love can act as an impetus for goals that give meaning to life. Love, at its best, is manifested by the endeavor to make things develop, grow, and come forward…’ (Maatta and Uusiautti xi) – such is the expansion of the effect of love, such is the widespread of the positivity of love. Not only can it heal or renew but also can create things, can turn impiety to piety:
Love does not always succeed. But for its most radical devotees – the Dido of Ovid’s Heroides, the troubadour poets of the eleventh and twelfth centuries in Occitania, the famous lovers of Shakespeare, and Milton’s Adam and Eve – love is revolutionary, an attempt to tear down the world and build it anew, not in the image of authority, but that of a love that is freely chosen, freely given, and freely received,’ (Bryson and Movsesian 9).
Love has no language, it speaks ‘everywhere the same language’ (Priyadarshni and Micnhimer i) and finds ‘resonance in almost every heart’ (Priyadarshni and Micnhimer i). The anthology is, thus, like a tapestry where every emotion of the pious act of love has been threaded like a garland to crown the readers and to induce in them the multifariousness of love.






Work Cites
Browning, Barrett. A Poetical Works of Elizabeth Barrett Browning, London: Oxford University Press, 1904. Print
Bryson, Michael and Movsesian, Arpi. “Love and Authority: Love Poetry and Its critics”. Love and Its Critics. California: Open Book Publishers, 2017. Web <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1sq5vd6.5>
Enns, Diana. Love, Life, Death and survival”. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical journal 48,3 (2015): 47-55. JSTOR. Web. 20 Jan. 2019. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44030453
Maatta, Karina and Uusiautti, Satu. Many Faces of Love. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 2013.print
Martin, Adrienne M. “Love, Incorporated”. Ethical Theory and Mortal Practice 18,4 (2015): 691-702. JSTOR. Web.20Jan. 2019. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24478754
Priyadarshini, Nalini. A Doppelganger in My House. Gurgaon: The Poetry Society of India, 2016. print
Priyadarshni, Nalini and Micnhimer, D. Russel. Lines Across Oceans. Gurgaon: The Poetry Society of India, 2017.print
Shakespeare, William. “Sonnet 116”. The Sonnets. Ed. Evans, G. Blakemore. New Delhi:Cambridge University Press, 2011. 90. print


Bio: Chaitali Giri works as a Project Fellow in the department of English and Culture Studies at The University of Burdwan. She also teaches as a Guest Lecturer in English at MUC Women's College, Burdwan, WB, India. Her articles have been published in journals like Research Guru, New Academia etc. Five of her poems were published in the December, 2018 issue of SETU. Her email is chaitali.giri@gmail.com