Showing posts with label Sutapa Chattopadhyay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sutapa Chattopadhyay. Show all posts

Fiction: Protesting Wall Street

Sutapa Chattopadhyay

Sutapa Chattopadhyay

My article for Gothamist was due last night but there it was – staring at me from my laptop, a sorry example of dull and uninspired writing. My effort was frozen in mid-sentence with writer’s block tearing through my insides, leaving me empty, cold, and frustrated. I sighed and went to check my Twitter feed. Perhaps, my inspiration was right there, in 140 characters.

And… there it was – my feed was exploding!

“Occupy Wall Street is on! Come to Zuccotti Park or Chase Manhattan Plaza,” it said without fanfare.

I had packed already. A backpack with two changes of clothes, toothbrush, towels, razor, and a small tent I had bought at a drug store. I stuffed my laptop into the bag, closed my apartment door, and went out onto the street. I felt alive, exhilarated, like I was walking on air. Weeks of attending planning meetings, and nothing had been decided. Finally, I had gone back to my little apartment I shared with two friends in Greenwich Village and tried to write.

I stopped by my sister’s place to tell her where I would be. Julia was my twin, and we were both close. And closer since we didn’t have any family after my dad remarried for the third time and my mom disappeared into a villa in Capri with her art. We kept tabs on each other and were our own guardians.

Julia sounded a bit worried. “Andy, just be careful. I’ve heard that the protest will be broken up quickly.”

I said, “Don’t worry sis,” kissed her, pointed to my phone, “I’ll send you photos,” I said.

Zuccotti Park was already crowded with hundreds of protesters when I reached there. Audio equipment was being set up at a dais at the center of the park. All of us were keeping an eye on the police who had set up a perimeter outside the park and were closely watching us.

Soon the speeches started, protesting the wealthy one-percenters, the bailout of big banks but no student loan relief or mortgage relief for homeowners, no accountability for the wrongdoings committed during the Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 and a multitude of issues. I had planted myself next to the Suvero sculpture ‘Joie De Vivre,’ mostly to be able to see better. I met many of my friends there. We spent the day listening to the speeches, talking to people, and taking photos. There were singers, artists who gave their presentations. There were people in masks who walked around with pride, taking photos of each other!

There was a carnival like atmosphere, but the anger was palpable. After the financial crisis, only the Big Banks and Wall Street had come out of the crisis unscathed and richer than ever. Not a single CEO or a bank had been indicted for financial misconduct. In the meantime, people had been cruelly evicted from their homes when they could not pay their mortgages for a few months, with very little consideration for their well-being.

Detroit had been devastated because of the mortgage crisis, with the city just hollowed out. I met many people who had been squatting on abandoned property but often were beaten and thrown out by the police. A couple told me about their lives as squatters and as people who hitchhiked across the country to reach Manhattan. Their life as squatters was more dangerous than the hitchhiking, they felt. On many occasions, they were arrested and spent a few days in jail. But the arrest itself was traumatic, with violence inflicted on them if they resisted.

Night descended on the skyscrapers of Manhattan and a pale moon peeped out from the lacy veil of clouds. It was late, and I found a tiny bit of asphalt for myself, unfurled my tent, and went inside. With the space I had, I could barely squeeze my body into the tent. I saw faint, flickering lights emanating from the surrounding tall buildings where people were still working in a realm we wished to ‘occupy’ in our imagination and our collective soul. A poster at the end of our tent city said, “This space occupied.”

My friend Bill was in the tent next to mine. Food had arrived earlier at the park, donated by charities and restaurants. Bill and I shared a footlong sub, soft drinks and were full. We chatted into the night, till we dozed off around 1 AM, tired and not really knowing what to expect, but happy.

The next day, we woke up to the sound of commuters who were going to the offices surrounding Zuccotti Park. I wondered if my dad was among them. His business was a hedge fund, and his office was nearby. He was a billionaire and ranked among the wealthiest in America. During the divorce, he had given up joint custody, so Julia and I did not really know him well. This was the first time I had thought of him after years and mostly because of what the Occupy movement meant to him and to me on opposite sides of the struggle. If I knew him at all, he was thinking this was a nuisance and a place for bums to hang out, protesting when they should have been working.

Julia came that day and every day from then on with breakfast or lunch for me and some of my friends. She wanted to make sure I was not starving and was healthy. A few days later, she told me our mom would call and begged me not to hang up on her. I agreed but reluctantly.

“Andy, this is mom.”

“Hello mom, how are you?”

“I am fine. Concerned about you and your well-being at Zuccotti Park,” she said.

“Mom, there is nothing to worry about. Besides, I am covering this as a story for Gothamist.”

“Yes, I understand. But there are other ways of covering it. I see reporters outside on the periphery interviewing the protesters. You are embedded with them.”

“Mom, I am not going to argue with you. And if you are in touch with dad, please don’t share this with him. Although I doubt, he cares.”

“Andy, I haven’t talked to him in ages.”

“All right, mom. Julia and I are fine. Don’t worry.”

She hung up and I breathed a sigh of relief. Both Julia and I were in our mid-twenties, and we did not get any handouts from our parents. My dad had not left us with trust funds. That was all for the good. We had learned to fend for ourselves for a long time, while our mother lived in Italy from the proceeds of her divorce settlement.

On the fifth day, a library was set up with books that were donated by authors, readers, and students. I walked over to the library and helped carry the crates of books and set them up on shelves. It was a good collection of books, and I chose a few books and brought them back. I had a reading lamp and batteries, and the nights passed pleasantly, chatting with my close neighbors, reading, staring up at the night sky or simply losing myself in the oblivion of sleep.

After a few days, I noticed an older man, perhaps in his eighties standing at a particular section of the library, which had now become a tent with shelves. He was hovering around a stack of books, and I noticed that the books he chose were on economics and the historical origins of inequality.

We stuck up a conversation since we kept meeting every day.

“Hi, my name is Michael Benedetti. What’s yours?”

“I am Andrew Isikoff.”

We shook hands. Michael said, “I am a Professor Emeritus of Economics at Columbia University, and I found a surprising book here, something I was looking for in all the libraries of New York City.”

“Really? What book were you looking for?” I asked.

“Oh, it is a book by someone called Boris Isikoff,” he said.

The book he showed me was “On the Origins of Inequality in America” and the author Dr. Boris Isikoff of the New School, New York.

“Oh, you know, my grandfather’s name was Boris Isikoff. But he died a vagrant on the streets of New York. He was mentally ill but wasn’t committed to an institution,” I said.

Michael stared at me for a long time.

“You are Boris’s grandson?”

“If it is the same Boris we are talking about. My grandfather couldn’t have taught at the New School. He was depressed and it caused him to lose everything.”

“I was the last person to see Boris alive at a homeless shelter in New York. He was my friend. He died of a broken heart. Did you know that?”

I looked at him in utter astonishment.

“You saw him alive at a homeless shelter?”

“And watched him die that night.”

Michael was in tears, and he breathed heavily. I consoled him, put my arm around him while we slowly walked towards his tent. We sat on two plastic cartons outside and talked.

My grandfather’s story came out in bits and pieces amongst the din and bustle of the protest and the passersby and Michael’s start and stop style of talking. He would say something, then go deep into thought and introspection. Then, as if waking himself up, he would continue. Michael was also a bit out of breath, I thought. Probably lung problems or allergies made worse by living at Zuccotti Park.

“Boris Isikoff was a Professor of Economics in Berlin when in 1938, The New School in New York City invited him to emigrate. Along with many prominent German intellectuals, like Hannah Arendt, Eric Fromm, Theodore Adorno, and Leo Strauss, he moved with his family and settled happily in the city. The New School was a hub of innovative ideas and intellectual ferment in the country, ideas that found resonance in the White House of Franklin Roosevelt.

Teaching at the New School was very pleasant, and Boris began his scholar’s life in America by writing several learned treatises on inequality and the origins of inequality unique to America and its history.

Boris was first my graduate advisor and later we became close friends. I visited his house on Sundays for lunch or dinner. His family was very warm and welcoming. One of the first gifts I got from Boris was a beautifully bound copy of ‘Das Capital.’

Boris was brilliant. Ideas such as inequality, who benefited from the fruits of someone else’s labor were always on his mind. Being at the New School of New York, he had started to study political economy but from a more multidisciplinary angle When he first came to America, he was a generalist, well versed in economics, but decided that to make a difference, he needed to ‘know’ America, its local and regional politics and economy. To that effect, he and his graduate students would travel all over the country, especially the farm belt, to see firsthand how people lived. It was a revelation to all of us.

We were once invited by the First Lady, Eleanor Roosevelt to the White House to discuss America’s agricultural workers and small farmer’s problems. No one knew better about the farmers’ woes than Eleanor. She had travelled widely in the 1930s during the Great Depression and reported what she saw back to her husband. This was a roundtable discussion of many prominent economists. I was in the room, too, sitting at the back of the room, wide-eyed, listening to the conversation, wondering if I could ever reach that stage of intellectual maturity.

In 1944, Boris was called to Washington, D.C., to serve in FDR’s government as an economic advisor providing counsel on various programs that were part of the New Deal. He moved his family to Washington and very enthusiastically joined the White House staff. He worked at the West Wing offices and wrote influential papers that often reached the President’s desk.

After FDR’s death, he continued his advisory role with the Truman administration. But it wasn’t the same as before. Boris moved in and out of the Truman Administration, moving his family back and forth from D.C. to New York City and back.

I was in touch with him through letters we wrote each other, but I started my own career at Columbia University and my research diverged from his in many important ways,” said Michael of those years.

“I missed him and was invited often to visit his family for Thanksgiving and other holidays. They lived in a lovely townhouse in D.C., close to the White House and close to everything the city had to offer.

But, while moving between New York City and temporary stints with the Truman administration, Boris and his wife became estranged. It was too much for her to move her whole family with him at the drop of a hat. Boris had found his calling under the FDR administration, but under Truman, he was beginning to be ignored. That was a source of extreme irritation for him. He would write policy papers that never made it to the President’s desk,” said Michael.

I asked him why and he said, “Domestic economic development was not as much of a priority for Truman as recovery in Europe and Japan, the threat of Communism, nuclear proliferation, and other global issues.

To start anew, Boris moved to the State Department as senior economic advisor to the Secretary of State in President Truman’s cabinet. He felt his career would thrive here - he was an internationalist, and his experience was truly relevant when the Marshall Plan was being implemented. In fact, Boris did do well in the State Department.

But a couple of years later, Senator Joseph McCarthy's Anti-Communist campaign began in earnest and left many individuals suspected of collaboration with Communists terrified in its wake. A man of extraordinarily little understanding of political economy or international ideas, or any learning whatsoever, presided over the scare and paranoia in America that had no equal until then.

Boris’s name was among the fifty-seven State Department employees who were tagged by McCarthy’s staff as being Communist sympathizers. He started receiving visits from the FBI.”

Michael continued, “Boris was under tremendous stress. His wife left with the children for New York. She moved in with her parents and they got divorced. She had full custody of the children, your dad, and his siblings. Boris, it seems, could not be trusted with his children’s care or his own, and that became a self-fulfilling prophesy and his doom.

The FBI interrogations were a joke. They asked him questions about his background, why he wrote what he wrote without really understanding the subject matter. Hegel, Marx, Engels, and Freud and even his contemporary thinkers like Adorno, were beyond the FBI agents’ understanding. They quoted his books and research papers, where he wrote scholarly treatises based on these thinkers’ works and extended them in novel ways. They read them as if they were indecent and treasonous material. It drove him crazy – each interrogation, each insult drove a stake through his heart. Communism was a dirty word after World War II, and America turned on those whom they thought were Communists, Socialists, and anything in between. Many of these people were emigres from Europe, escaping fascism.

The FBI inquiry and the accusations were too much for him. He quit the State Department. But back in New York, he had not been in academia for many years, and the New School did not have a permanent position for him. They, however, gave him an adjunct teaching position, and the contract was renewed every year. The New School is always protective of their own, so he had a job and a decent salary, enough for him to survive. They had done the same for other political emigres from Europe.

However, Boris was forced to live under much more humble conditions than he was accustomed to. He gave up possession of his large apartment in downtown Manhattan. He wrote on inequality, which was the primary motivation and passion of his life, but now his work was not read or cited as much. Many publishers who were once honored to publish his work in the 1940s, started rejecting him. He needed graduate students to help him with the research, but he had none.

He started descending into depression and insanity. Heartbreak was the main reason. He could not believe this turn in fortune. And without his family, he just broke down.

Boris could no longer teach at the New School. They continued paying him, but after a while, he simply stopped going to his bank, doing anything normal. He lost his apartment, his only refuge, because he forgot to pay rent. In the meantime, he also dropped out of sight of his friends. I had moved to England for a sabbatical year to teach at University College,” said Michael choking back tears.

“When I came back in 1965, I contacted Boris’s colleagues, and no one had seen him. A couple of years passed. Then suddenly, when I was standing at a newsstand, I saw an old man, pushing a cart with dirty clothes and looking around, trying to find a place to sit. Something about the turn of his head made me look again, and there he was! Boris!

I dropped whatever I was doing and called out his name. He looked back with a look of non-recognition. I had to introduce myself, but he did not seem to understand. I did not let that deter me. But Boris looked sick, pale, and tired. He had splotches of blood on his hands, neck, and feet, not yet dry. I called 911 and asked for help. An ambulance came and picked him up and I followed the ambulance to Bellevue Hospital.

The large, cavernous hospital with its ‘city within a city’ vibe and commitment to help everyone was a welcome respite for Boris’s travails. He may have been past any recollection of what was safe, but I was relieved. Boris stayed there for 3 weeks. At the end of three weeks, he was evaluated and told to come to the hospital for psychological counseling. They also found a shelter for him, a humble one-room apartment in the city, which was part of a hotel. I was relieved that he had a place to stay. I told the other occupant of the apartment to keep an eye out for him and to call me if he was in trouble.

Boris did not stay out of trouble. One night, I got a frantic call from his roommate. Boris had gone outside in the blinding rain and been run over by a car. It was a hit and run. He was admitted to Bellevue again.

This time he was injured more seriously. The hospital asked for next of kin. I tried to find his ex-wife, but I had no idea where she was. I said I was the closest thing to the next of kin for him. In two days, Boris was at the end of his tragic life. I sat with him that last night, holding his hand and listening to his belabored breathing.

However, he had no lucid moments - those moments of clarity that many people who are about to die often experience. I was asked if a rabbi could come for spiritual support, but knowing him, I said that Boris was an atheist and would not have approved. I was told to leave, visiting hours were over. Next morning, I had the phone call that he was gone.

I held a funeral for him, and he was buried at a downtown cemetery. I invited his old colleagues and graduate students. Many people whom he had taught, mentored or who knew him in D.C. attended. They gave heartwarming speeches on his legacy. But then I thought, where were these people when he desperately needed them? And why is there a lack of genuine diversity of opinion in mainstream economics and policy making?

So that, Andy, is the story of your grandfather. He was an honorable man, who wanted nothing but the best for his country and knew how to give great advice to Presidents. Our nation, with its extreme paranoia and fear let him down. Does that sound familiar?”

I looked at the statue of the Wall Street Bull nearby.

I said, “Sadly, yes, it sounds remarkably familiar Michael. I am so glad I met you!”

“Looking at what is happening to our country, this protest, the banks and bailout, the searing dissatisfaction among us, the 99%, I know he could have helped us at this inflection point in America. He could have helped other economists if he had led a full life. But who is listening today? The politicians on the left of the spectrum are already trying to co-opt our message. And politicians to the right are leveraging this to their advantage. There is hypocrisy on every side, a desire to keep the status quo at any cost, and I don’t know who is more out of touch!”

 A few wet and chilly days and nights later, after dinner, I decided that it would be my last night at Zuccotti Park. I had attended enough demonstrations, enough media spectacle, but the attention to our movement was waning. I would need to find other ways to protest. This protest did not have a specific purpose, had no leader, and seemed to be nothing more than a media spectacle. It is true, it showed the immense dissatisfaction among the people. But what of it? What exactly could we do? And I was sure politicians of every stripe would use our arguments but then forget about us. I decided, I would go home and write about it at Gothamist and at any paper that would accept my writing. I did a lot of soul-searching to come to this conclusion that night. I am sure that the Occupy Movement would spawn other movements in the future and supply a language for other protests, I just needed to find my place in it.

I also decided to tell Michael the next morning. After Julia brought us breakfast, I went over to where I thought Michael’s tent was, but he was gone! Someone handed me a letter he had written to me. It said:

Dear Andy,

 I am glad to have met you and happy I was able to tell you the story of your grandfather. I have lived with the guilt of not doing anything for him these many decades. And worse, not doing anything about what Boris believed in passionately - and I did too - as his graduate student. I thought economics was a noble profession. Instead, I was seduced by the elegance of the mathematics behind economics. But that approach was unmoored from reality. It is our collective blind belief in markets without regulation that has let us down. Can you believe it, I even worked at a Hedge Fund, trying to find quantitative strategies to make money while everything was going up in flames? We were leveraging one currency against another, one asset against another. Money-making was where my mind was, until ‘Occupy Wall Street’ happened.

It is up to you now to carry your grandfather’s legacy forward. You did not know him, but now you do. Do not take anything for granted. Question everything like Boris did. I have faith in you. You are well-read and you ask the right questions. You can help now more than I can in my last feeble attempt at redemption.

I must leave Zuccotti Park because I am not feeling well. Sleeping on the pavement is not for an 80-year-old man. I will either see you on the other side or I will not. But we will have those moments we shared with each other, and I am happy about that.

My love to you and Julia,

Michael


***
Bio: Sutapa Chattopadhyay is a technologist who has worked for more than 38 years as a software engineer. In her spare time, she loves reading and writing. Her favorite genres are biography, history, literature of the nineteenth century, and modern classics.  She also gets inspiration from writers of Indian origin such as Jhumpa Lahiri.
A short essay of hers has been recently published in an anthology of memoirs “A Body of Memories: A collection of personal memoirs and essays” edited by Lopamudra Banerjee. An essay of hers was also published in “SETU” magazine in September, 2023.

The Glorious Now

Sutapa Chattopadhyay

Sutapa Chattopadhyay

Many people tell me I have an unusual name: Poulomi. According to one of many Sanskrit translations, it means ‘a ray of the sun’. For me, my name transcends it’s meaning, becoming an embodiment of the hope I discovered with Shekhar. A vibrant waltz against the austere temple bells of tradition, it challenged the ironclad rules of marriage that cage us and expectations that suffocate our individuality.
Shekhar was an unusual person. His beliefs were deeply sincere and honest. Societal norms, often relics of a bygone era, held no sway over him. And he lived up to what he believed in, without hypocrisy. He did not promise me eternal, everlasting love: he knew things could end. What he did promise was living in a glorious present which I did with him for a few moments of our lives. In my view, it was worth it although I never told him that. He and I were fully alive then. And I had no guilt whatsoever.
According to him, human beings cannot and should not be in a relationship when it has ended, and it usually does because of life itself. Being together after that makes no sense except it makes us live an inauthentic life. He said Hindu mythology also subscribed to this. Radha, Krishna’s beloved wasn’t his wife. In fact, she was married to someone else. The love between them was real, as real as physical reality can be.
We never really met each other as students at IIT Bombay (Powai). I was an engineering student and Shekhar an MSc student in Mathematics. Actually, we did meet, it was brief, and the encounter was one of irritation for me. I bumped into him at one of the cafeterias at the Institute. He spilled his coffee on me. I wiped the hot coffee off my arms, brows furrowed in irritation and walked off. That’s it.
Agni Shekhar Mukherjee – Shekhar to all - was a student interested in everything around him. He studied the classics, politics, history and philosophy and everything that interested him. His favorites were the Enlightenment philosophers, Kant, Hume, Nietzsche. He studied it outside coursework with diligence.
Shekhar’s dad was a teacher at ‘Don Bosco’ school. A teacher of History. They could barely afford to send him to IIT Bombay, but he wanted to go, and he came to IIT Bombay which had a great Mathematics Department.
My dad was an Engineer at Steel Authority of India in Asansol. We were financially well off. I took the Joint Entrance Exams (JEE) exams, did well and got into IIT Bombay to study Electronics and Computer Engineering. It was a triumphant moment for me and my family to be one of the first to get into a prestigious college via mastering the JEE, and the first woman in the family to travel long distance to study at IIT Bombay.
In college, I did well and built an impressive resume. I also had a boyfriend. We were both busy building our resumes to go to the US, but we came to know each other well enough given the constraints of the time. His name is Gautam Tarafdar, also from Calcutta.
Gautam was from an impoverished middle-class family in Calcutta. He went to ‘Calcutta Boys’ school which his parents could not afford but his dad was an employee of the school, so he did not need to pay tuition.  At IIT, it was smooth sailing for him with his merit cum need scholarship to pay his tuition and all other expenses.
In 1979, the year we graduated, we prepared for the GRE, sat for the exams, applied to several colleges in the US and waited anxiously for the results. I got into University of Maryland for an MSEE degree and, fortunately, so did Gautam.


Gautam and I both got our master’s degree from University of Maryland at College Park. Gautam always wanted to be an entrepreneur. In 1982, we got married in India with the blessings of our parents. Both our parents were happy for us. Gautam got a job at a startup that was a precursor to Cisco, making routers for the internet traffic. He was very excited as he was interested in making better, more reliable, and faster routers. He wanted to start his own business eventually.
I, too, got a job at Cypress Semiconductor, a maker of computer chips. Life was perfect. This marked the beginning of our rapid ascent as highly skilled immigrants in Silicon Valley.
I am speeding through the narrative of our married life. It wasn’t remarkable in any way. My marriage, though, was one of constant adjustment for me, I felt. I came from a progressive family where girls got educated and worked outside the house. By 2007, Gautam was a wealthy man, but his value system remained rooted in the narrow alleyways of North Calcutta - a very traditional place where the people lived as they always had, holding conservative views about women and their place in society. There is nothing wrong with such a value system, and many women live happily in its confines. But it wasn’t for me, and we were not compatible in many ways. He felt he was always right in his judgements about me and his family and staff who worked for him. It was deeply ingrained in him, no matter that he was now in Silicon Valley and in charge of a modern workforce.
Gautam started his business, and he called it ‘Concertina Networks’. It was a networking hardware and software provider. Gautam was a brilliant and renowned technologist. He had many patents to his name and papers that were highly cited in academic journals. But in the process of building the business, he had no time for his family. By 1992, we had two kids, Sharanya and Abhimanyu. I took care of both of them and worked as well.
All that isn’t really unique. That’s what happens in almost every immigrant household from India that I know with only a few exceptions. The difference was, Gautam was totally, maniacally involved in building his business. He worked almost 20 hours a day, worried about his venture’s funding all the time and was consumed with anxiety. He came home to sleep for 4 hours and went back to work. Driven and relentless, his pursuit of success meant an essential hardness of demeanor even with his family. He was impatient with his children and miserly in giving them any time. And he thought it was my job anyway.
There were times when he promised to spend more time with us. But it almost never worked out. As a middle-aged woman raising two children alone, I succumbed many times to self-pity. I lived in the world of imagination where I wrote stories for myself about a happy functioning marriage. But I felt utterly stuck and that is a deadly, suffocating feeling. My life was a broken Concertina. A crushed one.
I slept alone in our bed. I woke up and did the same things. Things were into such a groove, that I felt I could not get out of the miserable circumstances, so I might as well make the most of it. That meant, taking care of all the finances, building family wealth, pursuing my own career, and taking an interest in the arts, entertainment, and culture in the San Francisco area. When Gautam was struggling, it was necessary to take care of all these things. Nothing was certain about his success.  His company was later bought by Cisco in 2007 and he became wealthy as I explained earlier.
In 2012, my youngest, Abhimanyu, went to college at Stanford. We both were relieved. I felt the first sense of liberation. Sharanya and Abhimanyu were both doing well, and they did not need me!
In 2014, I finally decided to take a sabbatical and go to India for a few months. If I liked it, I would resign from work. Gautam didn’t really care, and we did not need the extra income.  And he would not miss me. I could buy an apartment in Mumbai or Calcutta for our family. We had enough to buy an apartment in both cities. I had close connections to Calcutta and Mumbai.
Landing in Mumbai as a “single” woman was a new adventure for me. I was fearful but also excited. I hunted for and rented a nice apartment in a posh area of Mumbai near the financial district. My mom came to live with me. All the new setup, the buying of stuff to make a comfortable life was time consuming and exciting.
Finally, after a couple of months, I got in touch with my batchmates through the alumni network. IIT Mumbai was having a reunion and I decided to attend. I was extremely nervous because I had been in touch with my classmates in California but never in India. I hadn’t gone back to IIT Mumbai in 35 years.
The reunion began by all of us gathering in a spacious auditorium where each attendee received a personal welcome along with a flower garland. I found the flower greeting rather peculiar, yet it added a touch of charm to the experience of reconnecting with friends from years ago. They all seemed to know me although I could not place people and had forgotten many names.
The third day was when I first saw Shekhar. He was now working as an advertising executive in a company in Mumbai. Shekhar was giving a speech on his business and the opportunity for Indians in 2014 in the field of advertising in the Indian media market. But the speech – like everything about him – was about everything under the sun. I had read about him in our alumni magazines but barely knew him. His speech made me sit up in my chair! It was brilliantly interdisciplinary, and Shekhar had the knack of effectively connecting various disciplines to his advantage.
After his speech, came the evening’s various entertainments and dinner. My table had an empty seat next to me for Gautam – I had booked his tickets too in the hope that he would come. He wasn’t there as usual.
I was talking to my classmate sitting on my right when suddenly the chair next to me was pulled over and Shekhar seated himself with his heaping plate of food.
“Decided to change my table for more interesting company” he said and started eating.
“Hey, who among us is more interesting to you Shekhar? Me?” Rajesh piped up. Rajesh Kakkar, all smiles.
“Nope. It’s Poulomi”, he said with no hesitation.
“Well, Agni Shekhar, nice to know I am interesting!”
“Oh, stop with the ‘Agni’ nonsense. I have no idea why my parents wanted me to be a fire breathing dragon. I am just Shekhar to all my friends” he said.
“I don’t yet know if you are interesting, but you are certainly someone I don’t know”, he continued.
“But Poulomi, do you remember that scalding cup of coffee I spilled on you in the cafeteria?” Shekhar said.
“No, I don’t remember.”
“Oh well, that comes from being so undistinguished/indistinguishable I suppose. I was one of the teeming masses.”
I was at a loss for words.
The evening progressed and I came to know what Shekhar was up to. He lived in Mumbai, was an advertising executive and his wife had gone back to Calcutta, and he was going back to Calcutta in a few years’ time, but not now. It was all so unsettled, so unlike my life where every single step was taken with careful planning, weighing the pros and cons on spreadsheets! I was intrigued. Shekhar was absolutely straightforward in his dealings.
He looked at the chair on which he was sitting and read the name when he got up for seconds from the buffet.
“Oh, this is Gautam Tarafdar’s chair. Blech!!” he commented.
I pretended I did not know Gautam. So, I asked:
“Why do you say that? Blech?”
“Oh, I used to know Gautam because he was in charge of all the electronics and lighting at our cultural festivals” he said.
“Gautam was relentlessly ambitious. Nothing he did was ever just for fun. It was all for his own future that he put so much faith in. There was a steel-edged hardness to him. Almost like a robot. I remember he dated someone…. let me see…OMG, you!!”
“Yes, I am married to him”.
Shekhar made a face but never apologized.  Everyone else was listening but with eyes down, pretending they weren’t listening. That was typical Shekhar. There was no filter on his words.
Somehow, I did not take offense to anything that night. My marriage with Gautam was on the rocks long ago. I saw it with a detached sense. And Gautam seemed far away, physically, and mentally. A galaxy away from me.
During the evening my resume-oriented cover story poured out to Shekhar with the rest listening in and pretending not to. I was looking to buy an apartment in Mumbai perhaps near the Santa Cruz airport. Shekhar volunteered immediately to show me around the city, it’s landmarks and apartments as well.
Then as the evening ended, he said:
“Ok Poulomi Tarafdar – although I liked your maiden-name Sarkar better – I will see you tomorrow”.
“Ok” I said and walked out in a haze. My mom asked me at home how the reunion went as she did every night, and I was unintelligible, I am sure of that.


Thus began our acquaintance and later a serious relationship. Shekhar never attempted to hide anything from me. He told me that his marriage was on the rocks and his wife had left to go back to Calcutta and to live with her parents. They fought so much that it was better for his son to have peace and serenity than see his parents’ fights which could damage him forever.
It was a dangerous thing to spend time with him. We both had very rocky marriages and were meeting like two shipwrecked ships facing each other amidst treacherous ice. I paid no attention to my inner voice, though. Somehow, I felt I had to know what it is to be loved for oneself. Did Gautam love me like that, or did he want me as his prize? If I went away now to the US,  would I die an unloved spinster in my mind even though I wasn’t a spinster. Secondhand experiences would not do for me.
But I wasn’t as blind as one might imagine. I had come to India to escape my life in the US. And I felt entitled to my own happiness. Was it selfish?  I am too close to the affair to know. But certainly, Gautam did not need me. Why the fidelity to someone who doesn’t really care that much about me. In Asansol, standing before the fire during our wedding ceremony, we took seven steps together. Did that mean I was destined to die alone? That was silly. I certainly did not feel like Anna Karenina, carried away by guilt. Or Hester Prynn for being a seductress.
We went apartment hunting, but also saw the sights of Mumbai. We went to famous eateries. Visited landmarks, museums and historical buildings, had coffee and pakoras, Vada Pav and all the delectable food offered at food stands in Mumbai. It was wonderful. I felt light and free.
A few months into our friendship, Shekhar said he loved me. We were at Juhu beach, a crowded place with bags of peanuts we shared between us. He came close to me, held my hand and said:
“Poulomi, you know by now, I love you, don’t you? I haven’t spent as much time with any woman - with the exception of Sudeshna - than I’ve spent with you.”
“I love you very much. As I’ve told you many times, the relationship is between us, and no one should care. I don’t really care about societal norms or where this will go”, he continued.
I looked at him and said:
“But Shekhar, I am married”.
“Duh, don’t I know that? So? Do you love Gautam? You wouldn’t be out with me if you did! What’s all this nonsense about being married? Is that a condition where we are condemned to eternal damnation?”.
“That’s true, Shekhar, I am out with you almost every day”. But I still did not say anything in return about loving him.
“I am going to Calcutta to meet my wife, Sudeshna. I need to make sure Nikhil is ok. I will be gone for a week”.
We parted with sadness that night. Nikhil is Shekhar’s 8-year-old child and the light of his eyes!
Somehow my mom’s radar was up. She asked me a lot of questions about where I was. I felt like a teenager again, but that is not unusual in my relationship with her. I deflected the conversation by talking of the apartments I had seen that day.

The fortnight or so he was away, I missed him terribly. I hung around the house and mooned and sighed. And it was my mom who took me shopping and talked incessantly, which got on my nerves. But in those 2 weeks, I decided to have an affair with Shekhar. But my mom could not witness it. So, I asked my brother to come and get her to Hyderabad where he lived for a few weeks. My brother wasn’t so sure how safe we were, my mom and I, and he happily complied.
The moment my mobile phone rang with his identification on it, my heart leaped. I’ve never felt so much excitement before, never with Gautam when we were dating or newly married.
I picked it up and said “Shekhar, I missed you so much! I love you. Now come and get me”.
“So, you love me too, Poulomi? Repeat it. I want to hear it again”.
“And, by the way, I am not Arjun, the warrior son of the Pandavas, to come and get you on horseback like he did with Subhadra!!”, he said.
“Oh, shut up. Don’t be so wordy. Come and get me, Shekhar!”.
After a few more minutes, he said:
“Ok, where do we meet?”
“Mom is gone to Hyderabad to stay with my brother. Come over to my apartment”.
He did. My mom was gone, and we spent the night at our apartment. I’ve never been happier.
Look, gentle reader (I am a fan of Charlotte Bronte and this expression of hers), I am a techie and an artisan with software and electrons.  What do I know of love? I do, but not enough to describe it in poetry. This experience struck me as sublimely poetic.
We stayed in our apartment, ordered food via a food app, talked and made love. I’ve never seen him or myself happier.
So, did I fulfill - like a description on a resume - an experience that I’ve never really had? I don’t know and I don’t care.


My mom decided to stay a few more days with my brother. So, I booked a flight to Kochi for Shekhar and myself. I also booked a private villa at a beautiful resort there in Mararikulam.
Thus, began our stay in Mararikulam. The beach was sun-kissed in the morning and drenched in moonlight at night. We took long walks along the beach, swam in the ocean when we could. We went to the vegetable gardens or to look at the herb and flower garden. We slept in hammocks. Shekhar had his ‘Categorical Imperatives’ by Kant which he read lying on the hammock. Beats me how he could read such serious stuff, but he enjoyed it. We swung in the hammocks, drinking, watching the tall trees and birds and each other.
It was a time of total abandon and freedom for both of us.  We acted like a newly married couple, and no one suspected anything. We also went on a houseboat tour. But it was such a lovely experience at the resort that we stayed there most of the time.
Shekhar loved freshly caught fish and we ate Kingfish at a restaurant out in the moonlight every night. The coffee at the estate was so good. I’ve never tasted better coffee after that stay in Kerala.
Shekhar gave me garland of flowers to wear on my hair like a South Indian lady. We took thousands of photos to remember this by, as if we knew it was going to end inevitably.


On day eleven of our stay, Shekhar got a call from his wife. Nikhil had hurt himself when he fell down the stairs. He was in the hospital for observation.
Shekhar was white and shaking unable to do anything. I booked his flight home to Calcutta immediately and packed his bags. He left. We parted without words, but we hugged knowing somehow, we would not be together again, ever.
I returned to Mumbai, disconsolate, bereft. Thankfully, my mom was not there to observe me.
I knew now that Nikhil meant everything to Shekhar. I could not possibly get in the way. Besides, Shekhar had told me a divorce is really hard in India. Many people, even advertising executives are separated, not divorced. The courts take too much time to grant one and it costs a lot of money, money that isn’t worth spending if you don’t have unlimited amounts of it. Many of my alumni friends in India are separated but not divorced. And if he did divorce, he would still need to provide for his family. Sudeshna wasn’t working.
If I agreed to just being a mistress and to steal moments here and there with Shekhar with difficulty, the situation I was in was ludicrous to me. I had abandoned all my beliefs about the sanctity of marriage or fidelity. But I wasn’t going to be able to be with Shekhar even if I left my family, and he couldn’t leave his.
There was also the question of my very conservative mom who knew nothing (so I thought) and who would not approve. Even after 40 years, I was looking for her approval. She would have a conversation on how to suffer through my marriage with Gautam. I would not have been able to stand such a conversation.
It was the essential hypocrisy in all our relationships in our middle-class society. Stick to something even if you feel like you are drowning. My mom would have tried to tell me that in many ways. And it would have buried me brick by brick, her judgements.

I called Shekhar in Calcutta. He returned my call after he had privacy.
“What’s up love? I am coming back in a week. Nikhil is ok now; he will go back to school on Monday”.
“I am relieved Shekhar. So glad. But I am flying back to San Francisco tomorrow. Abhimanyu is coming back from Stanford with a high fever. Gautam isn’t handling it. I need to go back to make sure it isn’t anything serious.”.
“Couldn’t you wait a bit? Isn’t Sharanya there?”.
“No, it can’t wait. Sharanya called me. She is only 22, I don’t think she should be her brother’s keeper”.
None of the above was false except the sense of urgency. Abhimanyu would have been all right even without me being there. Sharanya had called only to inform me, not to ask me to come back.
We both bade each other farewell on the phone and I hung up in tears.


I went back to a deserted house in California, as empty as I was inside. I missed him terribly. Abhimanyu recovered soon after, but I am not sure I did.
I thought of divorcing Gautam and finally brought it up in late 2016. We agreed to an amicable divorce. He did leave me a portion of his estate including our house. I did not care too much about what he left me because I had my own savings too. I quit my work.
Shekhar tried to call me and email. I didn’t reply and he stopped after a while.

I was living in a state of some peace and serenity. I was travelling and writing, things I loved to do. I had made up my mind never to go back to Shekhar and I kept my resolution.
Suddenly one fine day in July, I got an email from our alumni network:
“With deep regret, we would like to announce the death of Agni Shekhar Mukherjee on July 20th, 2017. He was admitted to Lilavati Hospital after suffering a massive heart attack on the night of July 19th. He never woke up. Shekhar breathed his last at 6:30 AM. He is survived by his wife Sudeshna and son Nikhil. Memorial services at his home are being arranged by friends.”.
Lots of emails about tributes poured in. Since they were aware that I knew him, they asked me to contribute for his family’s resources and his son’s college fund. After I got over my catatonic shock, I did contribute. It took almost a month. Thank God my mom wasn’t here!
One never gets over a death like that. Was he thinking of us, on his last moments in life? Was he missing me terribly? I knew him so well, yet he was gone!! I spent weeks in bed, staring at the ceiling and touching the pearl earrings he put on my ears in Mararikulam that I hadn’t taken off.
Do I regret having this affair? Not at all. It has enriched my life in a way that could not have happened if I hadn’t jumped in feet first, not thinking of anything. We only have one life to live, that’s not a trite thing to say, and one must live it as one sees fit.

***
Bio: Sutapa Chattopadhyay is a technologist who has worked for more than 38 years as a software engineer. In her spare time, she loves reading and writing. Her favorite genres are biography, history, literature of the nineteenth century, and modern classics.  She also gets inspiration from writers of Indian origin such as Jhumpa Lahiri.
A short essay of hers has been recently published in an anthology of memoirs “A Body of Memories: A collection of personal memoirs and essays” edited by Lopamudra Banerjee. An essay of hers was also published in “SETU” magazine in September, 2023.

The Quilt

Sutapa Chattopadhyay

Sutapa Chattopadhyay


At the National Museum of American History in Washington DC, I came across a new exhibit that intrigued me. I happened to find it serendipitously, while looking for something else. A few rooms in the museum were dedicated to quilts that were woven by people who had either been born into slavery or were poor sharecroppers during the Reconstruction years; quilts that came from plantations in the South. The quilts told unique, diverse stories of pain, perseverance, and the private love of each of the artists who had made them. They were quite remarkable in both form and content.

I was struck by the similarities between these quilts and the quilts of my childhood. It dawned upon me at that moment that we humans are the same at heart, and our recorded history is often written by unknown artists.

My fascination with quilts started from when I was a young girl in Patna, India. My grandmother gave me one when I was about 6 years old. It was made of small pieces of cloth in beautiful, symmetrical patterns against a white backdrop. But there were some tableaus, as well, stitched into the cloth which were meant to tell her personal stories. At the very center was a piece of cloth in the shape of a little girl, with her hair tied in a single short braid. The girl was skipping happily and running, it seems, towards a rising sun. The braid was very much like my braid, so I asked her what it meant. She said:
“This girl is you, my dear child. I want you to be as carefree and happy as this sweet child in the quilt. I want you to be free to do whatever you want, chasing your dreams every day with the rising sun.”
Much later, learning my grandmother’s history as a homemaker in the early twentieth century, I understood what she meant. It took many years for me to understand the core ideas behind her creation. 
She was married when she was barely 9 years old, too young to have an adult relationship with a man, 15 years her senior. After the day of the wedding, and with the marriage not consummated, she stayed in her father’s home until she reached childbearing age. Then, she came to her in-laws’ home and became a part of her husband’s household, as a new bride, the lowest member in the strict hierarchy of the family. She was there to take care of a large joint family along with her other sisters-in-law, who were closer to her than her own sisters. One of her duties was to raise the large brood of children in the household, not just her own, but born to the many members of the extended clan, her husband’s brothers, cousins, sometimes sisters and other relatives. None of this was unusual. This was the story of a girl born in that period of history.

The sisterhood sustained these women. It was their collective job to run the family’s day-to-day activities; to help prepare the food, to serve, to raise the children. They were the last to eat, after everyone had had their lunch or dinner. They were the last to go to bed, after everyone had retired. They were always inside the innermost sanctum of the cavernous houses unless it was a large picnic outside, an outing for the whole family, usually strictly supervised by the matriarch. Every one of the daughters-in-law, though, had to veil her face with the borders of her saree during those occasions, so that her face was not visible.

But quilting was an activity they learned growing up in their husband’s homes that was pleasurable. These works of decorative art were made in a large room, with just the women in the room. Everyone would be seated on the floor on large handmade bamboo rugs. Large pieces of spare cloth were put in the center. The women cut and stitched on the floor, laughing, and gossiping. This activity took place mostly in winter.

The warm comforters, the artistic ones, symbolized life, or their aspirations for themselves and for those who received them as gifts. Unable to express themselves, these comforters were a vessel for their inner desires, their sorrows, their tears, their hidden wishes. Some of those going through a rough patch in their life would have their teardrops fall on the newly made quilts, mingling with the needlepoint and the colorful threads, to evaporate on the white background.

I used to hug my grandma’s quilt, trying to deeply breathe in the scent of the fabric while wrapping it closely around myself on a cold Indian winter night. Did I taste the salt of a teardrop there? Did I see a little drop of blood where she could have pricked herself with the needle? And what was that in a corner, pieces of cloth cut like a palanquin with a woman inside? Was it her tear-stained face peeping out, leaving her father’s house, leaving her abode of love and everyone she knew, to venture into an uncertain future, a future in which she had no hand in making any decision for herself?

And who was that baby in another corner, angelic, with cherubic dark curls, on a little makeshift hammock, with the mother in the background, busy making pickles? Was that the first child she lost to meningitis when she was eighteen? The child, the baby of her dreams, snatched from her by Yama, the God of Death? Could she still hear him call out for her, grasp her fingers with his little ones?

The quilt also comforted me when I was unhappy or depressed. When I saw my own self-determination being taken away from me by an indifferent patriarchy, I mingled my tears with hers as I hugged the quilt and I became one with her, although she was long gone.

You see, a quilt speaks to me even now. It carries those hidden sorrows of my beloved grandmother across the thousands of miles separating her from a girl born in a new age in an independent India, a girl emigrating to another land. It tells me to carry on the heritage of fearless women; to do what she would have wanted me to do through her hidden messages. It also tells me to preserve a piece of my dearest grandma, who paid with her blood, sweat and tears, for being born during an indifferent time, but who somehow overcame it to live to a grand old age.

She would have wanted me to learn that lesson of survival. She would have wanted me to accept my fate with grace, but to make a statement in my own way. She would have wanted me to live the way she made the quilt: to try to live in the confines of a situation with equanimity, not to make too many waves but to finally assert myself in a unique, meaningful way. I may not have stuck by some of her desires for me, but I certainly understood the message of stoicism when I saw it in the quilt, her legacy, that she left just for me.
***

Bio: Ms. Sutapa Chattopadhyay is a lifelong technologist who has worked for more than 38 years as a software engineer. In her spare time, she loves reading and writing. Her favorite genres are biography, history, literature of the nineteenth century, and modern classics.  She also gets inspiration from writers of Indian origin such as Jhumpa Lahiri.

A short essay of hers has been recently published in an anthology of memoirs “A Body of Memories: A collection of personal memoirs and essays” edited by Lopamudra Banerjee.